Abstract
PurposeIn recent years, crowdsourcing – an open and innovative model for outsourcing tasks to a crowd – has become popular for production processes, allowing organizations and firms in different industries to access external skills and expertise efficiently. Companies have opened their innovation processes to crowds outside their boundaries, and users and customers are often involved in developing products in line with market needs. This work aims to investigate the link between crowdsourcing, production and quality to better understand this new interesting phenomenon.Design/methodology/approachAn explicit and systematic method for reviewing the literature was used. Through the selection and analysis of the relevant articles in the field, this paper presents a comprehensive overview of the pros and cons, risks and opportunities, disadvantages, or concerns, as addressed in the literature, for the adoption of crowdsourcing in the production processes.FindingsIt identifies where, how and to what extent crowdsourcing can be applied profitably within the production of products and services, highlighting how crowdsourcing could affect product and process quality. Finally, some directions for future research are outlined from the analysis conducted.Originality/valueThis work applied the systematic literature review to investigate and evaluate the actual use and impact of crowdsourcing on the production process, focusing on quality enhancement contribution.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference88 articles.
1. Crowdsourcing for requirements engineering: a simplified review;International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications,2018
2. Design crowdsourcing: the impact on new product performance of sourcing design solutions from the ‘crowd’;Journal of Marketing,2018
3. Crowdsourcing and crowdfunding in the manufacturing and services sectors;Manufacturing and Service Operations Management,2020
4. A systematic literature review on total quality management critical success factors and the identification of new avenues of research;The TQM Journal,2017
5. Crowdsourcing augmented reality environment (CARE) for aesthetic evaluation of products in conceptual stage;Computers in Industry,2018
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献