Using BPM governance to align systems and practice

Author:

Doebeli Gaby,Fisher Ron,Gapp Rod,Sanzogni Louis

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose a business process management (BPM) governance model that sets BPM decision making, along with roles and responsibilities. The setting context of the study is a government‐owned corporation operating in Australia.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative case study examined and analysed organisational documents using a content analysis approach. Results of document analysis are used to inform a series of in‐depth interviews of key stakeholders in the organisation. Interviews are analysed using a constant comparison method to derive themes and build categories of description.FindingsA BPM governance model is proposed. Results of thematic analysis are interpreted against the framework of the BPM governance model, leading to findings that include implications for theory and practice.Practical implicationsIn practical terms, the research shows how BPM practice can be aligned and integrated with the corporate governance and management systems in the selected case study organisation.Originality/valueDespite research identifying the importance of governance, along with associated capabilities, there has been little progress on how the abovementioned capabilities can be effectively deployed across an organisation. This paper addresses a gap in the literature relating to how to deploy BPM governance in an organisation.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference48 articles.

1. Armistead, C. (1996), “Principles of business process management”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 48‐52.

2. Armistead, C. and Pritchard, P. (1999), “Strategic business process management for organisational effectiveness”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 32, pp. 96‐106.

3. Cook, K., Hardin, R. and Levi, M. (2005), Cooperation Without Trust, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY.

4. Creswell, J. (2003), Research Design: Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

5. Davenport, T. (1993), “Need radical innovation and continuous improvement? Integrate process reengineering and TQM”, Planning Review, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 6‐12.

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Toward agile Business Process Management: Description of concepts and a proposed definition;Knowledge and Process Management;2023-01

2. A map for the holistic BPM diagnosis;Business Process Management Journal;2022-05-13

3. Connections between Governance and Business Process Management – BPM;International Journal for Innovation Education and Research;2022-04-01

4. Barriers to implementation of business process governance mechanisms;Engineering Management in Production and Services;2021-12-01

5. The Use of Business Process Management in Hotel Direct Sales Improvement;TEM Journal;2021-02-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3