Critical factors for knowledge management in project business

Author:

Ajmal Mian,Helo Petri,Kekäle Tauno

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to identify and examine various factors that influence the success or failure of knowledge management (KM) initiatives in project‐based companies.Design/methodology/approachFollowing a literature review, the study proposes a conceptual model of six factors of potential importance to the success of KM initiatives. The model is then examined through an online survey of project managers and assistant managers from project‐based businesses in Finland.FindingsThe study finds that a lack of incentives and the absence of an appropriate information system are the most significant barriers to successful KM initiatives in projects.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of the study may be restricted in terms of generalisability because of the limited empirical study.Practical implicationsProject managers should formulate an attractive incentive package to encourage project members to participate in KM initiatives and to suggest ideas for new KM opportunities. Managers should also ensure that an effective user‐friendly information system is in place before introducing KM initiatives.Originality/valueThe study proposes a new model of critical success factors for KM initiatives in the context of project‐based business.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference37 articles.

1. Ajmal, M.M. and Koskinen, K.U. (2008), “Knowledge transfer in project‐based organizations: an organizational culture perspective”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 7‐15.

2. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001), “Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107‐36.

3. Amabile, T.M. (1997), “Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do”, California Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 39‐58.

4. Briner, R.B. and Reynolds, S. (1999), “The costs, benefits, and limitations of organizational level stress interventions”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20, pp. 647‐64.

5. Chase, R.L. (1997), “The knowledge‐based organization: an international survey”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 38‐49.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3