Author:
Smith Jeffery S.,Nagy Paul F.,Karwan Kirk R.,Ramirez Edward
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine to what extent the factors of the operating environment influence the structural dimensions and subsequent performance of a firm's recovery system.Design/methodology/approachUsing contingency theory and a sample of 158 service firms, this research tests for structural differences in service recovery systems based on Schmenner's widely‐cited taxonomy, the service process matrix. To conduct the analysis, both multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) models were tested to assess overall system differences and to detect individual dimensional differences.FindingsThe results indicate that differences in the structure of service recovery systems do exist across divergent operating environments. Additionally, differences in performance measures were found only in capability improvements, while customer‐oriented performance did not vary across operating environments.Originality/valueThe paper is believed to be the first to empirically investigate how differences in operating environments increase the likelihood that firms will employ divergent recovery system configurations. This work yields valuable insights into how organizations can design their systems to more appropriately respond to the demands of the environments in which they operate. The results also lend credence to the concept of equifinality, which suggests similar ends are attainable through multiple means.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference83 articles.
1. Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977), “Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 396‐402.
2. Bell, C.R. and Zemke, R.E. (1987), “Service breakdown: the road to recovery”, Management Review, Vol. 76 No. 10, pp. 32‐5.
3. Bendapudi, N. and Leone, R.P. (2003), “Psychological implications of customer participation in co‐production”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67 No. 1, pp. 14‐28.
4. Bitner, M.J., Booms, B.H. and Tetreault, M.S. (1990), “The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 71‐84.
5. Blodgett, J.G., Hill, D.J. and Tax, S.S. (1997), “The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on post complaint behavior”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 73 No. 2, pp. 185‐210.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献