Author:
Ahmed Qadeer,I. Khan Faisal,A. Raza Syed
Abstract
Purpose
– Asset intensive process industries are under immense pressure to achieve promised return on investments and production targets. This can be accomplished by ensuring the highest level of availability, reliability and utilization of the critical equipment in processing facilities. In order to achieve designed availability, asset characterization and maintainability play a vital role. The most appropriate and effective way to characterize the assets in a processing facility is based on risk and consequence of failure. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– In this research, a risk-based stochastic modeling approach using a Markov decision process is investigated to assess a processing unit's availability, which is referred as the risk-based availability Markov model (RBAMM). RBAMM will not only provide a realistic and effective way to identify critical assets in a plant but also a method to estimate availability for efficient planning purposes and resource optimization.
Findings
– A unique risk matrix and methodology is proposed to determine the critical equipment with direct impact on the availability, reliability and safety of the process. A functional block diagram is then developed using critical equipment to perform efficient modeling. A Markov process is utilized to establish state diagrams and create steady-state equations to calculate the availability of the process. RBAMM is applied to natural gas absorption process to validate the proposed methodology. In the conclusion, other benefits and limitations of the proposed methodology are discussed.
Originality/value
– A new risk-based methodology integrated with Markov model application of the methodology is demonstrated using a real-life application.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference23 articles.
1. Brok, J.F.C.
(1987), “Availability assessment of oil and gas production systems”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 4, pp. 21-36.
2. Castro, H.F.
and
Cavalca, K.L.
(2003), “Availability optimization with genetic algorithm”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 20, pp. 847-863.
3. Cekyay, B.
and
Ozekici, S.
(2010), “Mean time to failure and availability of semi-Markov missions with maximal repair”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 207, pp. 1442-1454.
4. Chang, D.
,
Rhee, T.
,
Nam, K.
,
Chang, K.
,
Lee, D.
and
Jeong, S.
(2008), “A study on availability and safety of new propulsion systems for LNG carriers”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 93, pp. 1877-1885.
5. Crowl, D.A.
and
Louvar, F.J.
(2001), Chemical Process Safety, Fundamental with Application, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献