The care trust pilgrims

Author:

Miller Robin,Dickinson Helen,Glasby Jon

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to reflect on English care trusts as an example of a structural approach to integration.Design/methodology/approachAll current care trusts' chief executives were invited to participate in a semi‐structured interview exploring their experiences. Themes from the interviews were combined with findings from literature and policy review.FindingsThe current care trusts can identify a number of advantages from combining health and social care into a single organisation. Equally, they also experienced many of the anticipated difficulties, and in hindsight half of those interviewed would recommend other options to achieving better integrated working. Whilst the “commissioning” function of care trusts will not survive beyond March 2013, “provider” care trusts look set to continue and indeed expand their service delivery. They will be joined both by new integrated social enterprises delivering health and social care.Practical implicationsThe experiences of care trusts show the limitations of a single organisational structure as a means to achieve better integration and the impact of a changing national policy landscape on local initiatives. The findings suggest that the current legal flexibilities for integrated working should remain to enable local areas to decide how best to achieve their priorities and to realise the importance of addressing local cultural, practical and leadership issues along with structural barriers.Originality/valueThis paper provides a reflection on the ten years since the option of care trusts were available in England and adds to the current literature which focuses on individual care trusts' development and impact.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)

Reference21 articles.

1. Curry, N. and Ham, C. (2010), Clinical and Service Integration: The Route to Improved Outcomes, The King's Fund, London.

2. DH (2002a), “Care Trust application, consultation, assessment and establishment processes”, available at: www.dh.gov.uk.

3. DH (2002b), “Care trusts: background briefing”, available at: www.dh.gov.uk.

4. DH (2009), Transforming Community Services: Enabling New Patterns of Provision, Stationery Office, London.

5. DH (2010), Liberating the NHS: Legislative Framework and Next Steps, Stationery Office, London.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3