Abstract
PurposeIn 2011, community nursing services were reorganised in England in response to a national policy initiative, but little is known about the impact of these changes. A total of three dominant approaches emerged: (1) integration of community nursing services with an acute hospital provider, (2) integration with a mental health provider and (3) the establishment of a stand-alone organisation, i.e. without structural integration. The authors explored how these approaches influenced the trends in emergency hospital admissions and bed day use for older people.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology was a longitudinal ecological study using panel data over a ten-year period from April 2006 to March 2016. This study’s outcome measures were (1) emergency hospital admissions and (2) emergency hospital bed use, for people aged 65+ years in 140 primary care trusts (PCTs) in England.FindingsThe authors found no statistically significant difference in the post-intervention trend in emergency hospital admissions between those PCTS that integrated community nursing services with an acute care provider and those integrated with a mental health provider (IRR 0.999, 95% CI 0.986–1.013) or those that did not structurally integrate services (IRR 0.996, 95% CI 0.982–1.010). The authors similarly found no difference in the trends for emergency hospital bed use.Research limitations/implicationsPCTs were abolished in 2011 and replaced by clinical commissioning groups in 2013, but the functions remain.Practical implicationsThe authors found no evidence that any one structural approach to the integration of community nursing services was superior in terms of reducing emergency hospital use in older people.Originality/valueAs far as the authors are aware, previous studies have not examined the impact of alternative approaches to integrating community nursing services on healthcare use.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health(social science)
Reference32 articles.
1. Bardsley, M., Steventon, A., Smith, J., Dixon, J. and Nuffield Trust (2013), “Evaluating integrated and community-based care: how do we know what works?”, available at: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2017-01/evaluating-integrated-community-care-web-final.pdf.
2. The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence;BMC Health Services Research,2018
3. Factors that promote and hinder joint and integrated working between health and social care services: a review of research literature;Health and Social Care in the Community,2014
4. QIC program and model selection in GEE analyses;The Stata Journal,2007
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. 2000s: Transforming Community Services;Community Nursing Services in England;2023