2000s: Transforming Community Services

Author:

Bramwell Donna,Checkland Kath,Shields Jolanta,Allen Pauline

Abstract

AbstractThe new millennium saw the publication ofThe NHS Planin 2000, which bought a welcome focus to community health services (CHS) and the role of community nursing. We outline the proposals contained in the plan which furthered the quasi-marketisation of the NHS and increased commissioning of health care at the local level of Primary Care Trusts (PCTs)—replacing Health Authorities (HAs) and Primary Care Groups (PCGs). A further review by Lord Darzi and subsequent policy,Transforming Community Services: Enabling new patterns of provision(DoH, 2009) instigated the separation of commissioning/provision and laid out timetables for how PCTs were to do this. The long held roles of the district nursing service continues in this era, although not always clearly defined, understood or acknowledged and policy attempts to expand their remit feature heavily. This included more clinical tasks as well as focusing on such things as public health/health protection and promotion programmes that improve health and reduce inequalities. This chapter also describes the uncertainty for frontline nurses that the Transforming Community Services (TCS) brought in terms of who their employer would be or what management arrangements they would work under given the establishment of some standalone Trusts, some third sector and some combined acute/community Trusts. The aims of the TCS programme were bold but in reality achieved little by the end of the era.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference39 articles.

1. Allen, P., & Petsoulas, C. (2016). Pricing in the English NHS quasi market: A national study of the allocation of financial risk through contracts. Public Money & Management, 36, 341–348.

2. Boaden, R., Dusheiko, M., Gravelle, H., Parker, S., Roland, M., Sargent, P., & Sheaff, P. (2006). Evercare Evaluation: Final Report. University of Manchester, National Primary Care Research and Development Centre.

3. Bramwell, D., Checkland, K., Allen, P., & Peckham, S. (2014). Moving services out of hospital: Joining up general practice and community services? PRUComm.

4. Checkland, K., Coleman, A., & Harrison, S. (2011). When is a saving not a saving? The micro-politics of budgets and savings under Practice-based Commissioning Public Money and Management, 31, 241–248.

5. Checkland, K., Coleman, A., Segar, J., McDermott, I., Miller, R., Wallace, A., Peckham, S., & Harrison, S. (2012). Exploring the early workings of emerging clinical commissioning groups: Final report. Policy Research Unit in Commissioning and the Healthcare System (PRUComm).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3