Exploring privacy paradox in contact tracing apps adoption

Author:

Duan Sophia XiaoxiaORCID,Deng HepuORCID

Abstract

PurposeUnderstanding the privacy concerns of individuals in the adoption of contact tracing apps is critical for the successful control of pandemics like COVID-19. This paper explores the privacy paradox in the adoption of contact tracing apps in Australia.Design/methodology/approachA comprehensive review of the related literature has been conducted, leading to the development of a conceptual model based on the privacy calculus theory and the antecedent-privacy concern-outcome framework. Such a model is then tested and validated using structural equation modelling on the survey data collected in Australia.FindingsThe study shows that perceived benefit, perceived privacy risk and trust have significant influences on the adoption of contact tracing apps. It reveals that personal innovativeness and trust have significant and negative influences on perceived privacy risk. The study further finds out that personal innovativeness is insignificant to perceived benefit. It states that perceived ease of use has an insignificant influence on perceived privacy risk in the adoption of contact tracing apps.Originality/valueThis study is the first attempt to use the privacy calculus theory and the antecedent–privacy concern–outcome framework for exploring the privacy paradox in adopting contact tracing apps. This leads to a better understanding of the privacy concerns of individuals in the adoption of contact tracing apps. Such an understanding can help formulate targeted strategies and policies for promoting the adoption of contact tracing apps and inform future epidemic control through effective contact tracing for better emergency management.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Communication

Reference73 articles.

1. Familiarity with big data, privacy concerns, and self-disclosure accuracy in social networking websites: an APCO model;Communications of the Association for Information Systems,2017

2. Exploring individual personality factors as drivers of M-shopping acceptance;Industrial Management and Data Systems,2009

3. Who should I grant access to my post?: identifying the most suitable privacy decisions on online social networks;Internet Research,2021

4. Non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 pandemic: review of contact racing and social distancing technologies, protocols, apps, security and open research directions;Sensors,2022

5. Acceptability of app-based contact tracing for COVID-19: cross-country survey study;JMIR mHealth and uHealth,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3