A systematic review of paradoxes linked with digital transformation of business

Author:

Singh NidhiORCID,Vishnani Sushma,Khandelwal VinayORCID,Sahoo SaumyaranjanORCID,Kumar SatishORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis review study aims to explore the prevalent paradoxes in digital transformation (DTN) of business and provide insights on how businesses can effectively navigate them.Design/methodology/approachThe study conducts a systematic literature review, utilizing findings from a bibliometric analysis. A sample of 229 articles published in top-tier journals, retrieved from the Scopus database, is reviewed to identify nine clusters representing different sectors and paradoxes in DTN.FindingsThe review identifies and summarizes studies addressing the paradoxes that arise during DTN in various sectors. Scholars have analyzed the growing need for digital innovations and the benefits they bring, but this study aggregates high-quality research to address the gap in understanding prevalent paradoxes.Originality/valueThis study provides valuable insights into the paradoxes of DTN and offers guidance to businesses on effectively managing these challenges. It contributes to the existing literature by consolidating and presenting key research findings in this domain.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference103 articles.

1. Secrets and likes: the drive for privacy and the difficulty of achieving it in the digital age;Journal of Consumer Psychology,2020

2. Beyond the privacy paradox: objective versus relative risk in privacy decision making;MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems,2018

3. Information disclosure and privacy paradox: the role of impulsivity;Data Base for Advances in Information Systems,2020

4. Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the web of science and Scopus;Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2009

5. Knowledge creation dynamics of technological forecasting and social change special issues;Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3