Author:
Parida Aditya,Kumar Uday,Galar Diego,Stenström Christer
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to provide a literature review of the performance measurement (PM) in maintenance. The authors aim to discuss the background and development of the PM for maintenance, besides defining the concept of performance measures for maintenance and the frameworks developed.
Design/methodology/approach
– A detailed and extensive literature search and study was undertaken by the authors on the concept and definition of PM, performance indicators (PIs), maintenance performance indicators and various performance frameworks. The history and theory of PM over different phases of business and technological developments have been critically examined and analysed in this review paper.
Findings
– This paper reviews and presents the different PIs and PM frameworks like; balanced scorecard (BSC), performance prism, performance pyramid and performance matrix, etc., and identifies their characteristics and shortcomings. After considering related issues and challenges, frameworks and approaches for the maintenance performance measurement (MPM) are also presented, where the emerging techniques like; emaintenance have also been discussed amongst others. More and more industries are applying the balanced and integrated MPM frameworks for their competitive survivability and sustainability.
Practical implications
– The concept, issues and approaches considered for the MPM frameworks can be adapted by the practicing managers, while trying to define and develop an MPM framework for the operation and maintenance activities. The considerations of the advantages and limitations of different frameworks can provide insights to the managers for implementation.
Originality/value
– Some literature reviews on MPM and MPM frameworks are available today. This paper makes an attempt to provide a detailed and relevant literature review, besides adding value in this new and emerging area.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference207 articles.
1. Abran, A.
and
Buglione, L.
(2003), “A multidimensional performance model for consolidating balanced scorecards”,
Advances in Engineering Software
, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 339-349.
2. Ahlmann, H.
(2002), “From traditional practice to the new understanding: the significance of life cycle profit concept in the management of industrial enterprises”, Proceedings of the International Foundation for Research in Maintenance, Maintenance Management
&
Modelling, Växjö, 6-7 May.
3. Åhrén, T.
(2008), “Maintenance performance indicators (MPIs) for railway infrastructure”, doctoral thesis, Luleå University of Technology.
4. Åhrén, T.
and
Parida, A.
(2009), “Maintenance performance indicators (MPIs) for benchmarking the railway infrastructure: a case study”,
Benchmarking – An International Journal
, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 247-258.
5. Al-Najjar, B.
(2007), “The lack of maintenance and not maintenance which costs: a model to describe and quantify the impact of vibration-based maintenance on company’s business”,
International Journal of Production Economics
, Vol. 107 No. 1, pp. 260-273.
Cited by
102 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献