Performance measurement and management for maintenance: a literature review

Author:

Parida Aditya,Kumar Uday,Galar Diego,Stenström Christer

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a literature review of the performance measurement (PM) in maintenance. The authors aim to discuss the background and development of the PM for maintenance, besides defining the concept of performance measures for maintenance and the frameworks developed. Design/methodology/approach – A detailed and extensive literature search and study was undertaken by the authors on the concept and definition of PM, performance indicators (PIs), maintenance performance indicators and various performance frameworks. The history and theory of PM over different phases of business and technological developments have been critically examined and analysed in this review paper. Findings – This paper reviews and presents the different PIs and PM frameworks like; balanced scorecard (BSC), performance prism, performance pyramid and performance matrix, etc., and identifies their characteristics and shortcomings. After considering related issues and challenges, frameworks and approaches for the maintenance performance measurement (MPM) are also presented, where the emerging techniques like; emaintenance have also been discussed amongst others. More and more industries are applying the balanced and integrated MPM frameworks for their competitive survivability and sustainability. Practical implications – The concept, issues and approaches considered for the MPM frameworks can be adapted by the practicing managers, while trying to define and develop an MPM framework for the operation and maintenance activities. The considerations of the advantages and limitations of different frameworks can provide insights to the managers for implementation. Originality/value – Some literature reviews on MPM and MPM frameworks are available today. This paper makes an attempt to provide a detailed and relevant literature review, besides adding value in this new and emerging area.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference207 articles.

1. Abran, A. and Buglione, L. (2003), “A multidimensional performance model for consolidating balanced scorecards”, Advances in Engineering Software , Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 339-349.

2. Ahlmann, H. (2002), “From traditional practice to the new understanding: the significance of life cycle profit concept in the management of industrial enterprises”, Proceedings of the International Foundation for Research in Maintenance, Maintenance Management & Modelling, Växjö, 6-7 May.

3. Åhrén, T. (2008), “Maintenance performance indicators (MPIs) for railway infrastructure”, doctoral thesis, Luleå University of Technology.

4. Åhrén, T. and Parida, A. (2009), “Maintenance performance indicators (MPIs) for benchmarking the railway infrastructure: a case study”, Benchmarking – An International Journal , Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 247-258.

5. Al-Najjar, B. (2007), “The lack of maintenance and not maintenance which costs: a model to describe and quantify the impact of vibration-based maintenance on company’s business”, International Journal of Production Economics , Vol. 107 No. 1, pp. 260-273.

Cited by 102 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3