Students' perception on learning methods in engineering disciplines

Author:

Vidal BorjaORCID,Fenollosa Ribera M. LoretoORCID,Ribal Francisco Javier,Sanchis Pablo,García-Rupérez JaimeORCID,Bes-Piá M. AmparoORCID,Blasco-Tamarit E.ORCID,Noguera PatriciaORCID,Muñoz-Portero María JoséORCID,Tortajada Luis A.ORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis study explores the preferences for learning methods among the students of seven engineering disciplines in a Spanish technical university. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the students' views and from them contribute to the knowledge of the effectiveness of learning methodologies.Design/methodology/approachAn online anonymous questionnaire survey was adopted to collect students' perceptions. Seven learning methods were compared in seven engineering degrees. The authors sampled 1660 students, and 426 completed responses were analysed. In addition to a descriptive analysis of the results, a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was performed using R data processing software.FindingsIt was found that project-based learning and problem-based learning were perceived as the more effective ones. MCA identified response patterns between the preference and the efficiency of learning methods showing that students can be classified into two groups according to their preferred level of activeness in learning.Research limitations/implicationsThe study focusses on a single technical university and not all engineering degrees could be sampled. However, five different engineering fields were studied and no significant differences among them were found.Practical implicationsThe results add up to the known literature showing that students have different learning needs and consequently they perceive some methods as more effective. Instructors can use this information to strengthen their learning activities. Results also suggest that students can be classified into two groups in relation to their level of activeness in learning. This can also help to enhance general student motivation if two paths with different levels of activeness are planned.Originality/valueNo previous studies have compared several learning methods in different engineering fields. Thus, this study contributes to fill this gap and contributes to the body of evidence around learning methodologies from the perspective of students.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference47 articles.

1. Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues;Academic Medicine,1993

2. Analysis of introducing active learning methodologies in a basic computer architecture course;IEEE Transactions on Education,2015

3. Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering and medicine: determinants of students' engagement and persistance;Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,2012

4. Flipping the medical classroom: effect on workload interactivity, motivation and retention of knowledge;Computers and Education,2019

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3