Abstract
Purpose
– As the manufacturing industry is under pressure to face the global competition, it is necessary to improve productivity and reduce costs through minimization of wastage of resources for their survival. This paper aims to present an analysis of the status of resource flexibility and lean manufacturing through conducting a case study in an Indian textile machinery manufacturing company and also demonstrate the various areas of future scope for improving lean manufacturing.
Design/methodology/approach
– The case study has been conducted using the flexible system methodology (FSM) framework (Sushil, 1994). For measuring resource (labour and machine) flexibility and lean manufacturing, various factors contributing towards labour flexibility, machine flexibility and lean manufacturing are identified. To determine their relative weights, an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) has been used. A specially designed questionnaire is used to collect the information during case study on different aspects of resource flexibility and lean manufacturing. SAP-LAP analysis has also been carried out to look in to the ways the company is building up resource flexibility and lean manufacturing.
Findings
– The status of labour flexibility, machine flexibility and lean manufacturing is merely 49.30, 47.10 and 47.40 per cent, respectively. The most important factors of labour flexibility and machine flexibility attained a value of 59.50 and 61.17 per cent, respectively. Similarly, only 39.09 per cent wastes are eliminated through lean manufacturing. There is a huge scope to achieve a higher degree of lean manufacturing through focusing on continuous improvement, just in time (JIT) and resource flexibility factors.
Research limitations/implications
– The present study includes only labour and machines to compute the resource flexibility. Other resources may also be included to compute the overall resource flexibility.
Practical implications
– The present study provides guidelines to analyze the status of resource flexibility and lean manufacturing. According to conclusions, frail areas in the manufacturing system can be identified and a suitable course of action could be planned for the improvement. Hopefully, this study will help the firm’s management to identify the problems to manage resource flexibility and implement an effective lean manufacturing.
Originality/value
– In this work, the theoretical perspective has been used not only to update the original instrument, but also to study the subject from a perspective beyond that usually associated with resource flexibility and lean manufacturing.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference37 articles.
1. Abdulmalek, F.A.
and
Rajgopal, J.
(2007), “Analyzing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value stream mapping via simulation: a process sector case study”,
International Journal of Production Economics
, Vol. 107 No. 1, pp. 223-236.
2. Acaccia, G.M.
,
Callegari, M.
and
Michelini, R.C.
(1995), “Pilot CIM implementation for lean engineering experimentation”,
Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 185-192.
3. Behrouzi, F.
and
Wong, K.Y.
(2011), “Lean performance evaluation of manufacturing systems: a dynamic and innovative approach”,
Procedia Computer Science
, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 388-395.
4. Bhamu, J.
and
Sangwan, K.S.
(2014), “Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues”,
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
, Vol. 34 No. 7, pp. 876-940.
5. Chauhan, G.
,
Singh, T.P.
and
Sharma, S.K.
(2009), “Role of machine flexibility in lean manufacturing”,
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research
, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 25-33.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献