Author:
Culasso Francesca,Giacosa Elisa,Broccardo Laura,Manzi Luca Maria
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to underscore the impact of the family variable on performance. The authors were interested in understanding whether the differences between Family Firms (FFs) and Non-Family Firms (NFFs), on the one hand, and between large FFs and medium-sized FFs, on the other, were reflected in the performance achieved.
Design/methodology/approach
– In this paper a sample of 80 industrial companies listed on the Italian Stock Market (FTSE MIB and STAR indexes) were considered, and mixed criteria to distinguish FFs and NFFs (Smyrnios-Romano et al., 1998) were used. The empirical method allowed the development of some research hypotheses by exploiting the Pearson correlation.
Findings
– There are two main categories of FFs, which correspond to two different strategic and organizational categories, namely, the FFs listed on the large capitalized companies index (FTSE MIB) and the FFs listed on the medium-capitalized companies index (STAR). Each kind of FFs (large FFs and medium-sized FFs) has a specific effect on profitability and financial performance. Specifically, if a company is medium sized, family presence is a relevant variable in achieving better profitability and financial performance than NFFs of the same size; on the other hand, if the company expands to become a large one, the family presence is an irrelevant variable in terms of both profitability and financial leverage (debt ratio).
Research limitations/implications
– Limitations of the study concern the definition of the sample, as this paper focused on the industrial sector and the method adopted, as it could be integrated with some econometrical models. The implications of this paper are relevant for families and regulatory bodies because it helps them better understand the effects of governance and company size both on short- and long-term performance. Moreover, the findings of the study can influence the decision-making process of investors to identify the long-term outperformers listed on the Italian Stock Exchange.
Originality/value
– This study contributes to the literature on FFs by defining two different categories of FFs, namely, large and medium-sized. It seems that larger companies record a weaker family influence on short-term profitability.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference92 articles.
1. Adams, R.B.
,
Almeida, H.
and
Ferreira, D.
(2003),
Understanding the Relationship Between Founder-CEOs and Firm Performance
, New York University, New York, NY.
2. Alcorn, P.B.
(1982),
Success and Survival in the Family-Owned Business
, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
3. Anderson, R.C.
and
Reeb, D.M.
(2003), “Founding family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S
&
P 500”,
Journal of Finance
, Vol. 58 No. 3, pp. 1301-1328.
4. Astrachan, J.H.
and
Shanker, M.C.
(2003), “Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy: a closet look”,
Family Business Review
, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 211-219.
5. Baginski, S.P.
and
Hassel, J.M.
(2004),
Management Decision and Financial Accounting Reports
, Thomson South-Western, Mason, OH.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献