Analysis of reverse logistics implementation practices by South Australian construction organisations

Author:

Chileshe Nicholas,Rameezdeen Raufdeen,Hosseini M. Reza,Lehmann Steffen,Udeaja Chika

Abstract

Purpose – A large number of benefits have been reported when reverse logistics (RL) is fully implemented in the construction industry. However, RL is yet to become common place in the construction sector, particularly in Australia. The particular sub-sector in which RL operates is small and weak and the remainder of the sector must embrace and accommodate it comfortably. Research is lacking on how to promoting RL in the construction industry. Very little has been done to identify the current practices that have the potential to promote RL industry-wide. The purpose of this paper is to identify the practices that work well in the sector, a strategy could be mapped out to promote RL to all stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach – In order to fill the above gap, the present study used a mixed method approach to gather and evaluate current practices and their potential to promote RL in South Australia’s construction industry. Practices that were identified using a comprehensive literature review were evaluated with a questionnaire survey and series of interviews involving construction professionals. Findings – The findings are that practices facilitating deconstruction is the most important, followed by practices facilitating the use of salvaged materials in new construction to promote RL in South Australia. Awareness of deconstruction benefits, challenges and procedures at the organisation level and facilities and services at industry level were associated with RL implementation. Availability of salvaged materials in the market was found to influence its use in new construction and as a consequence its demand. Designing for reverse logistics is another practice that could facilitate deconstruction and the onus of its promotion lies mainly with the designers. Research limitations/implications – This research was confined to one state in Australia. As such the generalisation to other states and other countries should be treated cautiously. Practical implications – The findings of this study can help inform the industry and its stakeholders on areas that they need to concentrate more on to make the South Australian construction industry a fully RL integrated one. To that end the authors propose some recommendations arising from the findings reported here. Originality/value – This study makes a contribution to the body of knowledge on reserve logistics within a previously unexplored South Australian context. In addition, the study provides valuable insights into the contribution of RL practices to the construction industry.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference58 articles.

1. Abowitz, D.A. and Toole, T.M. (2010), “Mixed methods research: fundamental issues of design, validity, and reliability in construction research”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , Vol. 136 No. 1, pp. 108-116.

2. Addis, W. (2006a), “Making reclamation, reuse and recycling happen”, in Addis, W. (Ed.), Building with Reclaimed Components and Materials: A Design Handbook for Reuse and Recycling , Earthscan, London, pp. 5-24.

3. Addis, W. (2006b), “The world of reclamation, reuse and recycling”, in Addis, W. (Ed.), Building with Reclaimed Components and Materials: A Design Handbook for Reuse and Recycling , ISBN: 1844072746, Earthscan, London, pp. 25-54.

4. Agrawal, S. , Singh, R.K. and Murtaza, Q. (2015), “A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling , Vol. 97, pp. 76-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.02.009.

5. Aitken, J. and Harrison, A. (2013), “Supply governance structures for reverse logistics systems”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management , Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 745-764.

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3