Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report on the Bologna Process in the light of globalisation and examine how it affects curriculum and engineering education developments.Design/methodology/approachThe growing need for creative competitiveness and the striving for specific profiles of engineering qualifications that are of high quality whilst taking account of diversity, transparency have resulted in the declaration of the Bologna Process. The qualifications framework proposed involving the cycle systems are examined taking account of globalization, quality assurance, management and diversity of needs. The future opportunities are explored taking account of global expectations.FindingsThe present research reveals that the Bologna Process provides a means through which higher education institutions (HEIs) can be encouraged to provide more attractive curricula for the younger generation for differing cultures whilst catering for the broad range of engineering fields where they could become more active later. The point is made that it serves to re‐invent engineering to meet the needs of the twenty‐first century.Research limitations/implicationsThe present investigation focuses on the Bologna Process and its implications on engineering education in Europe. Future work hopes to extend this to other disciplines and to examine global effects in diverse cultures and also from gender, economic and development perspectives.Practical implicationsThis paper could provoke HEIs outside Europe to evaluating their policies, revise strategies and moderate existing provisions, thereby assessing impact of the Bologna Process on engineering education in different countries and cultures.Originality/valueAccount is taken of the diversity and transparency which have resulted in the declaration of the Bologna Process. The paper discusses and reports on developments, prospects and challenges faced in the engineering curriculum provision following the introduction of the Bologna Process in the culturally diverse European higher education area. The new field of process systems engineering is also reported.
Reference20 articles.
1. ABET (2002), Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs – Effective for Evaluations during the 2003‐2004 Accreditation Cycle, 3rd ed., ABET, Baltimore, MD.
2. Augusti, G. (2005), “Trans‐national recognition and accreditation of engineering educational programmes in Europe: recent developments”, Eur. J. Eng. Education, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 417‐22.
3. Augusti, G. (2006), “Trans‐national recognition and accreditation of engineering educational programmes in Europe: perspectives in a global framework”, Eur. J. Eng. Education, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 249‐60.
4. Augusti, G. (2007), “Accreditation of engineering programmes: European perspectives and challenges in a global context”, Eur. J. Eng. Education, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 273‐83.
5. Bologna Process (2005), “Proceedings, statements and surveys”, available at: www.bologna‐bergen2005.no.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献