Validation of information-seeking behaviour of nursing students confirms most profiles but also indicates desirable changes for information literacy support

Author:

Stokes PeterORCID,Priharjo Robert,Urquhart Christine

Abstract

PurposeThe study aims were: (1) to replicate a previous study by the first author to confirm previous findings (internal validity) and to check construct validity of previously proposed information-behaviour profiles, (2) to compare the information processes used by students in parallel with requirements of early professional practice.Design/methodology/approachA replication study used the same questionnaire, delivered online to all 175 students across three years of a BSc adult nursing degree programme on one UK university campus. The survey included questions on information seeking processes, personality, approaches to learning and self-efficacy with information literacy. The literature review examined evidence around the transition from nursing student to practitioner and the Association for College and Research Libraries (ACRL) standards for nursing information literacy.FindingsThe response rate was 86/175 (49%). The result verified findings on the most frequent information processes and association between approach to learning and information literacy self-efficacy. The personality findings differed. Combining results for both studies helped confirm most of the information-behaviour profiles. Mapping the frequent information processes against requirements of practice indicated gaps, particularly around professional networking.Research limitations/implicationsAs both studies were carried out at one higher education campus, further research to assess external validity is required.Practical implicationsInformation-behaviour profiles, plus the mapping, help librarians and tutors develop tailored information literacy support that is clinically relevant and support transition to practice.Originality/valueValidated a set of information behaviour profiles for nursing students and linked these to the requirements of professional practice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference88 articles.

1. ACRL (Association of College and Research Libraries) (2013), “Information literacy competency standards for nursing”, available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/nursing (accessed 31 March 2020).

2. ACRL (Association of College and Research Libraries) (2016), “Framework for information literacy for higher education”, available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (accessed 3 December 2020).

3. Pedagogical strategies to teach bachelor students evidence-based practice: a systematic review;Nurse Education Today,2016

4. The relationships between personality, perceptual, cognitive and technological variables and students' level of information literacy;Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,2019

5. Hospital nurses' information retrieval behaviours in relation to evidence based nursing: a literature review;Health Information and Libraries Journal,2018

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3