Understanding and improving patient safety: the psychological, social and cultural dimensions

Author:

Øvretveit John

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to provide researchers and practitioners with an overview of how organisation behaviour research (OBR) helps to understand and resolve patient safety problems in health care.Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes psychological, sociological and other social science theories and research which help to understand the causes of patient safety problems, how to implement change effectively and how to create an organisational culture of safety.FindingsSocial science perspectives and organisational behaviour research are beginning to show why improvements in patient safety are slow, and how to make lasting and effective change.Research limitations/implicationsSocial sciences and OBR have already helped make healthcare safer, but could make a greater contribution. Progress could be faster with greater awareness of the findings of this research and understanding of social science research paradigms.Practical implicationsBetter implementation and safer care could result from providing implementers and decision makers with more knowledge and access to social science research. More useful social science research could be developed by research funders and proposal reviewers gaining a greater understanding of social science methods and potential, and by including this research in a field made up largely of traditional experimental medical research methods.Originality/valueThis paper provides an overview of the scientific and practical contributions of social sciences to patient safety and shows where future studies could assist understanding of current challenges and speed implementation of change.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference58 articles.

1. ACSQHC (2005), “Open disclosure standard”, Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, available at: www.safetyandquality.org (accessed 31 December 2008).

2. AHRQ (2001), Making Health Care Safer. A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices: Summary, AHRQ Publication No. 01‐E057, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, available at: www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/summary.htm.

3. AHRQ (2008), “Researching implementation and change while improving quality”, Funding opportunity announcement: (R18); PAR‐08‐136, AHRQ Bethesda, available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa‐files/PAR‐08‐136.html (accessed 31 December 2008).

4. Andersen, R.M., Rice, T.H. and Kominski, G.F. (2007), Changing the US Health Care System: Key Issues in Health Services Policy and Management, Jossey‐Bass, New York, NY.

5. Braithwaite, J., Westbrook, M.T., Travaglia, J.F., Iedema, R., Mallock, N., Long, D., Nugus, P., Forsyth, R., Jorm, C. and Pawsey, M. (2007), “Are health systems changing in support of patient safety? A multi‐methods evaluation of education, attitudes and practice”, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 585‐601.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3