Why is patient safety a challenge? Insights from the Professionalism Opinions of Medical Students’ (PoMS) Research

Author:

McGurgan PORCID,Calvert K.ORCID,Narula K.,Nathan E.ORCID,Celenza A.ORCID,Jorm C.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionDespite increased emphasis on education and training for patient safety in medical schools, there is little known about factors influencing decision making regarding patient safety behaviours. This study examined the nature and magnitude of factors which may influence opinions around patient safety related behaviours as a means of providing insights into how Australian doctors and medical students view these issues relative to members of the public.MethodsA national, multicentre, prospective, on-line cross sectional survey was conducted using responses to hypothetical clinical scenarios. Three cohorts were surveyed - Australian enrolled medical students, medical doctors and members of the public.Participant responses were compared for the different contextual variables within the scenarios and the participants’ demographic characteristics – student, doctor, member of the public, gender and age (if public or doctors)/ seniority in the course (if a medical student).ResultsIn total there were 2602 medical student participants, 809 doctors and 503 members of the Australian public. Medical doctors were more likely than other cohorts to have statistically significant differences in how they viewed the acceptability of patient safety related behaviours; doctors were more tolerant of medical students not reporting concerning behaviours. Medical students’ opinions frequently demonstrated a ‘transition effect’, bridging between the doctors and publics’ attitudes, consistent with professional identity formation.ConclusionsOpinions on the acceptability of medical students’ patient safety related behaviours were influenced by the demographics of the cohort and the contextual complexity of the scenario. Although the survey used hypothetical scenarios, doctors and medical students’ opinions appear to be influenced by cognitive dissonances, biases and heuristics which may negatively affect patient safety.‘Opinion is the medium between knowledge and ignorance’ Plato

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference48 articles.

1. Rethinking healthcare as a safety-critical industry;Work,2012

2. Changing medical student attitudes to patient safety: a multicentre study;BMC Med Educ,2018

3. Standards for Assessment and Accreditation of Primary Medical Programs by the Australian Medical Council Kingston, ACT, Australia: Australian Medical Council Limited 2012. Available from: https://www.amc.org.au/accreditation-and-recognition/accreditation-standards-and-procedures/ (accessed July 2021).

4. Achieving good medical practice: guidance for medical students. GMC 2016. Available from: https://www.gmcuk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/guidance/student-professionalism-and-ftp/achieving-good-medical-practice (accessed July 2021).

5. Understanding the factors influencing doctors’ intentions to report patient safety concerns: a qualitative study;J R Soc Med,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3