A benchmarking methodology for metalcasting industry

Author:

Ribeiro Laura M.M.,Sarsfield Cabral J.A.

Abstract

PurposeTo provide the basis for the development of a specific benchmarking methodology for the foundry industry.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology was developed with the support of the Portuguese Foundry Association (APF). The project was structured in two stages: developing the model for the performance assessment (including performance indicators specially designed for the foundry companies); and conducting a pilot benchmarking exercise in order to validate the model. Both stages received the contribution of eight relevant national foundries.FindingsProvides information about expectations of the benchmarking partners group. Make available a specific benchmarking model for assessing the foudries' performance based on critical factors. Provides foundry‐oriented indicators. Confirms that benchmarking is a time‐consuming tool, demanding continuous commitment of the top‐managers.Research limitations/implicationsA limitation of the study is the number of benchmarking partners (eight foundries). The statistical analysis of the results based on this small sample was not practicable, preventing the definition of the presumed causal relations between improvement practices and performance outcomes.Practical implicationsThe benchmarking model is now available at the APF. From now on, this institution can provide its members with a tool for promoting the co‐operation among companies and to enhance and enlarge significantly the available information about this sector. This activity will, certainly, help to improve organisations' performance, upgrading the competitiveness of the metalcasting industry in Portugal.Originality/valueThis paper helps the development of benchmarking in the metalcasting industry in which the number of published studies is very limited.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Strategy and Management

Reference13 articles.

1. Anderson, B., Browne, J., Devlin, J. and Rolstadås, A. (1997), “Performance measurement: the ENAPS approach”, The International Journal of Business Transformation, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 73‐84.

2. Andersen, B. and Jordan, P. (1998), “Setting up a performance benchmarking network”, Production Planning & Control, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 13‐19.

3. Bemowski, K. (1991), “The benchmarking bandwagon”, Quality Progress, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 19‐24.

4. Camp, R.C. (1989), Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.

5. Carpinetti, L.R. and Melo, A.M. (2002), “What to benchmark? A systematic approach and cases”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 244‐55.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3