Public sector benchmarking: an application to Italian health district activity plans

Author:

Vagnoni Emidia,Maran Laura

Abstract

PurposeThe paper seeks to suggest an application of the benchmarking technique on the content evaluation of the health district activity plans (HDAPs).Design/methodology/approachA literature review on benchmarking leads to the definition of a benchmarking process, which is utilized to evaluate and compare the contents of the HDAPs. These documents link the planning activity of the health districts of a region to the objectives comprehensively established at higher levels. Consequently, to define a common level of comparison of the HDAPs, the contents of the texts are evaluated through an in‐depth study of the specific law prescriptions and the adoption of an hermeneutic point of view. The HDAPs collected among the health districts of a single Italian Region represent the empirical data set and their specific benchmarking involves the definition of benchmark scales and placement of “best practices”.FindingsBenchmarking can improve planning capabilities of the health districts pointing out their most positive differences. Its specific application on the HDAPs highlights its flexibility and usefulness; whilst at the same time, it opens new insights on the recent evolution of the health care systems towards accountability, cost consciousness and efficiency.Practical implicationsThe results of the benchmarking comparison will lead to the design of an empirical blueprint for framing health district planning data and improve the understanding of the region.Originality/valueThe paper highlights the role of benchmarking both in providing a comprehensive lecture key of the reality of district planning and suggesting cues from the best practices observed.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business and International Management,Strategy and Management

Reference61 articles.

1. Airoldi, G., Brunetti, G. and Coda, V. (1989), Lezioni di economia aziendale, Il Mulino, Bologna.

2. Bailey, K.D. (1995), Methods of Social Research (Metodi della ricerca sociale), Il Mulino, Bologna.

3. Bailey, W.T. (1982), “An appraisal of research designs used to investigate the information. Content of audit reports”, Accounting Review, Vol. 57, pp. 141‐6.

4. Balm, J.G. (1992), Benchmarking: A Practitioner's Guide for Becoming and Staying the Best of the Best, Quality and Productivity Management Association, Shaumburg, IL.

5. Barretta, A. and Vagnoni, E. (Eds) (2005), Il Benchmarking in ambito sanitario, Cedam, Padova.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3