The researcher's perspective on procuring public works projects

Author:

Cheung Esther,Chan Albert P.C.,Kajewski Stephen

Abstract

PurposeAs part of a comprehensive research study looking at implementing public private partnerships (PPPs), interviews with experienced researchers were conducted with the aim of realizing their views on private sector involvement in public works projects.Design/methodology/approachAmongst these interviews, five were launched with academics from Hong Kong and Australia, and two were conducted with legislative councillors of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region Government.FindingsFindings show that Hong Kong and Australian interviewees had previously conducted some kind of research in the field of PPP. “Different risk profiles” and “private sector more innovative/efficient” were highlighted as the main differences between projects that were procured by PPP and traditionally. Other differences include risk transfer. In a PPP arrangement the public sector passes on a substantial amount of the project risks to the private sector, whereas in a traditional case the public sector would take the largest responsibility in bearing these risks. Another common feature of the private sector is that it tends to be more efficient and innovative when compared to the public sector; hence its expertise is often reflected in PPP projects. It was agreed that the key performance indicators for PPP projects were unique to individual projects. The critical success factors mentioned by both groups included “transparent process”, “project dependent” and “market need”. Because PPP projects tend to be large‐scaled costly projects, adequate transparency in the process is necessary in order to demonstrate that a fair selection and tendering process is conducted. A market need for the project is also important to ensure that the project will be financially secure and that the private sector can make a reasonable profit to cover their project expenditure.Originality/valueThe findings from this paper have enabled a comparative analysis between the views of researchers in two completely different jurisdictions. With the growing popularity to implement PPP projects, it is believed that the results presented in this paper would be of interest to the industry at large.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference25 articles.

1. Al‐Sharif, F. and Kaka, A. (2004), “PFI/PPP topic coverage in construction journals”, Proceedings of the 20th Annual ARCOM Conference, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, September 1‐3, Vol. 1, pp. 711‐19.

2. Efficiency Unit (2008), Serving the Community by Using the Private Sector – An Introductory Guide to Public Private Partnerships (PPPs), 2nd ed., The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government, Hong Kong, March.

3. Ernst & Young (2005), Australian PPP Survey – Issues Facing the Australian PPPP Market, Ernst & Young, London, November.

4. Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M.K. (2004), Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.

5. Hughes, W., Hillebrandt, P., Lingard, H. and Greenwood, D. (2001), “The impact of market and supply configurations on the costs of tendering in the construction industry”, Proceedings of the CIB World Building Congress, Wellington, New Zealand, April.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3