Author:
Bucic Tania,Robinson Linda,Ramburuth Prem
Abstract
PurposeThis paper seeks to explore the effect of leadership style of a team leader on team‐member learning in organizations, to conceptually extend an initial model of leadership and to empirically examine the new model of ambidextrous leadership in a team context.Design/methodology/approachQualitative research utilizing the case study method is used for empirical validation.FindingsThe leadership style (transformational, transactional, or ambidextrous) adopted by the team leader has an operational effect on the development of learning as a strategic resource within the team, and the organization.Research limitations/implicationsCase studies can be criticized for potential lack of rigour. However, we have used multiple cases following replication logic and triangulation to offset this. Further, cases by nature are generalizable to propositions only, not populations. Thus, a valuable springboard is provided for further quantitative investigations.Practical implicationsThe leadership style adopted by the team leader affects team cohesion, perceptions of learning, and learning‐related performance within the team. The findings provide a rationale for greater emphasis on the role, behavior and leading style that are adopted by the leader in order to produce desired team‐level outcomes.Originality/valueThe paper provides much needed extension and empirical validation of the initial model of ambidextrous leadership. The results show that the leader does have an effect on the team, and also that the leader's leadership style is critical to team level learning and related performance. This is valuable knowledge for trainers, recruiters, teams and leaders.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Development,Social Psychology
Reference51 articles.
1. Alvesson, M. and Sveningsson, S. (2003), “The great disappearing act: difficulties in doing ‘leadership’”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 359‐81.
2. Ambrose, M.L. and Kulik, C.T. (1999), “Old friends, new faces: motivation research in the 1990s”, Journal of Management, Vol. 25, pp. 231‐92.
3. Argote, L., Gruenfeld, C. and Naquin, C. (2000), “Group learning in organizations”, in Turner, M. (Ed.), Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, NY.
4. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.
5. Barbuto, J. (2005), “Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: a test of antecedents”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 26‐40.
Cited by
51 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献