Author:
Cervai Sara,Cian Luca,Berlanga Alicia,Borelli Massimo,Kekäle Tauno
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to present an innovative model to evaluate the quality of the learning outcome in vocational education and training (VET) considering a wide approach that includes, in particular, stakeholders' expectations and perceptions.Design/methodology/approachThe Expero model was implemented in various kinds of vocational schools and educational institutions in different European countries.FindingsThe model was validated through review by several international experts and by translation into a quality standard certification model.Research limitations/implicationsExpero needs a larger testing phase in non‐European countries to validate its appropriateness. Different vocational systems in non‐EU countries could enrich and widen the model in terms of transferability and sustainability as well as fostering cross‐educational requirements and needs that may impact the quality of the learning outcome. The Expero model is mainly dedicated to vocational education and, in its current form, is not suitable to be applied to other levels of education (i.e. primary or secondary). Meanwhile, it seems promising in terms of its application in higher education institutions, in workplace learning, and in continuous professional training.Practical implicationsExpero permits analysis of the quality of the learning outcome, which constitutes the prior mission of a school. Being dedicated to the vocational sector, Expero is based on stakeholder evaluation, including school personnel, trainees, industries, companies and external bodies interested in a school's results. Applying the Expero model, a school can analyse its strengths and weaknesses in a systematic way; strengthening – or even creating – a collaborative network with its stakeholders finalised in improving learning outcome.Originality/valueAmong the various opportunities a school has to perform a quality assessment (ISO 9000, EFQM, CAF), Expero is the first model focused on the quality of the learning outcome based on multi‐stakeholder data analysis.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Development,Social Psychology
Reference25 articles.
1. Abdullah, F. (2006a), “The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 569‐81.
2. Abdullah, F. (2006b), “Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 31‐47.
3. Alliger, G.M. and Janak, E.A. (1989), “Kirkpatrick's levels of training criteria: thirty years later”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 42, pp. 331‐42.
4. Bates, R. (2004), “A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence”, Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 341‐7.
5. Cedefop (2009), The Shift to Learning Outcomes, Policies and Practices in Europe, Cedefop Reference Series 72, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献