Public relations, the public interest and persuasion: an ethical approach

Author:

Messina Alex

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to consider whether ethical persuasion can be part of public relations practice.Design/methodology/approachThe paper contends that the critical issue for practitioners is not whether they engage in persuasion, but whether they do so ethically. Accordingly, a definition of ethical persuasion is derived by examining unethical propaganda. The paper then considers what standard might be used to assess the ethics of persuasion. The notion of “the public interest” – ubiquitously linked to ethical practice in public relations – is considered but found to be too elusive to guide the practice individual practitioners. Other more assessable standards are identified, as is a guiding approach to ethics. The approach to ethics adopted in this paper is rule utilitarianism. The methodology of this paper is deductive and derivative analysis, argument and synthesis, drawn from a broad body of literature.FindingsPersuasion can be ethical, and a definition of ethical persuasion is proffered. The public interest is not a standard that individual practitioners can determine, decide, know, or apply to assess the ethics of their practice. Ethical persuasion can, however, be assessed using other standards, discussed in the paper. Consequently, a set of criteria and standards to practicing ethical persuasion is developed.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper does not extend into a discussion of practical persuasive techniques. Therefore, an extension of this examination could consider a thorough assessment of the ethics of practical persuasive communication techniques.Practical implicationsDirectly relevant to the daily work of public relations practitioners, communicators, adertisers and marketers, who are interested in acting ethically. The paper provide a basis for a guide to assessing the ethics of persuasive practice.Originality/valueThis paper confronts both the question of whether practitioners can use the notion of the public interest to assess the ethics of practice, and also what constitutes ethical (and unethical) persuasion, and considers how persuation can be used ethically.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Communication

Reference62 articles.

1. Allen, M. (1991), “Meta‐analysis comparing the persuasiveness of one‐sided and two‐sided messages”, Western Journal of Speech Communication, Vol. 55, pp. 390‐404.

2. Andersen, K. (1978), Persuasion: Theory and Practice, American, Boston, MA.

3. Baker, S. and Martinson, D.L. (2001), “The TARES test: five principles of ethical persuasion”, Journal of Mass Media Ethics, Vol. 16 Nos 2/3, pp. 148‐75.

4. Benditt, T.M. (1973), “The public interest”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 291‐311.

5. Bentham, J. (1948), A Fragment on Government and Principles of Morals and Legislation, Basil Balckwell, Oxford.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3