Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to consider whether ethical persuasion can be part of public relations practice.Design/methodology/approachThe paper contends that the critical issue for practitioners is not whether they engage in persuasion, but whether they do so ethically. Accordingly, a definition of ethical persuasion is derived by examining unethical propaganda. The paper then considers what standard might be used to assess the ethics of persuasion. The notion of “the public interest” – ubiquitously linked to ethical practice in public relations – is considered but found to be too elusive to guide the practice individual practitioners. Other more assessable standards are identified, as is a guiding approach to ethics. The approach to ethics adopted in this paper is rule utilitarianism. The methodology of this paper is deductive and derivative analysis, argument and synthesis, drawn from a broad body of literature.FindingsPersuasion can be ethical, and a definition of ethical persuasion is proffered. The public interest is not a standard that individual practitioners can determine, decide, know, or apply to assess the ethics of their practice. Ethical persuasion can, however, be assessed using other standards, discussed in the paper. Consequently, a set of criteria and standards to practicing ethical persuasion is developed.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper does not extend into a discussion of practical persuasive techniques. Therefore, an extension of this examination could consider a thorough assessment of the ethics of practical persuasive communication techniques.Practical implicationsDirectly relevant to the daily work of public relations practitioners, communicators, adertisers and marketers, who are interested in acting ethically. The paper provide a basis for a guide to assessing the ethics of persuasive practice.Originality/valueThis paper confronts both the question of whether practitioners can use the notion of the public interest to assess the ethics of practice, and also what constitutes ethical (and unethical) persuasion, and considers how persuation can be used ethically.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Communication
Reference62 articles.
1. Allen, M. (1991), “Meta‐analysis comparing the persuasiveness of one‐sided and two‐sided messages”, Western Journal of Speech Communication, Vol. 55, pp. 390‐404.
2. Andersen, K. (1978), Persuasion: Theory and Practice, American, Boston, MA.
3. Baker, S. and Martinson, D.L. (2001), “The TARES test: five principles of ethical persuasion”, Journal of Mass Media Ethics, Vol. 16 Nos 2/3, pp. 148‐75.
4. Benditt, T.M. (1973), “The public interest”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 291‐311.
5. Bentham, J. (1948), A Fragment on Government and Principles of Morals and Legislation, Basil Balckwell, Oxford.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献