Author:
Zalejska-Jonsson Agnieszka
Abstract
Purpose
– The aims of this paper is to investigate the overall satisfaction of occupants of green and conventional residential buildings and their perception of indoor environment quality (IEQ) and to study factors that may cause occupants’ dissatisfaction.
Design/methodology/approach
– Data were collected through a survey sent to occupants of comparable green and conventional multi-family buildings. The difference in responses between occupants of green and conventional buildings was analysed using Mann–Whitney (rank sum) test. The ordered logistic models were applied to the data to test whether the overall satisfaction changes depending on the level of acceptance of indoor environment quality and whether the building environmental profile and the apartment tenure affect occupant satisfaction.
Findings
– The results show that both categories of occupants are very satisfied with their apartments and that there is no statistically significant difference between the stated overall satisfaction of occupants living in green and conventional buildings, although a difference was found in the acceptance level for thermal and sound quality. The research highlights the importance of occupant feedback, user-friendly technical installations and the ability to control indoor environment. This knowledge is important for designers, engineers and developers alike in enabling them to improve dwelling quality and minimize post-occupancy problems.
Research limitations/implications
– It was not possible to include physical measurements of IEQ parameters; the analysis is based only on occupants’ responses, which may carry a certain subjectivity.
Originality/value
– The paper contributes to the understanding of IEQ from occupant perspective and to knowledge on green building performance.
Subject
Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference61 articles.
1. Abbaszadeh, S.
,
Zagreus, L.
,
Lehrer, D.
and
Huizenga, C.
(2006), “Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in green buildings”, Proceedings of Healthy Buildings 2006, Lisbon 2006, Vol. 3, pp. 365-370.
2. Armitage, L.
,
Murugan, A.
and
Hikari, Kato
(2011), “Green offices in Australia: a user perception survey”, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 169-180.
3. Atterhög, M.
(2005), “Increased competition in the swedish housing market and its effect on rents and quality of housing services for households”, Housing Theory and Society, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 32-49.
4. Banfi, S.
,
Farsi, M.
,
Filippini, M.
and
Jakob, M.
(2008), “Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings”, Energy Economics, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 503-516.
5. Bloom, B.
,
Nobe, M.
and
Nobe, M.
(2011), “Valuing green home designs: a study of ENERGY STAR Homes”, Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 109-126.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献