Green offices in Australia: a user perception survey

Author:

Armitage Lynne,Murugan Ann,Kato Hikari

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to deepen understanding of what is working and what is not working within green workplace environments. The paper examines management and employee perceptions of their experiences of working in green workplace environments and assesses the effectiveness of such places.Design/methodology/approachBeing the second stage of a longitudinal study, this paper relies on a data set derived from its survey of 31 management and 351 employee respondents occupying Green Building Council Australia Green Star‐rated offices for more than 12 months.FindingsThe green workplace is a great place to be, at least most of the time, but there is a discrepancy between the views of management who see greater benefits of the green workplace than their employees.Research limitations/implicationsBy focussing on green buildings, there is no control to establish a benchmark. Hence, the next stage of the research is a comparable study of a non‐green data sample. Also to be tested is – whilst managers and employees overall report satisfaction with their green workplace, what is the norm?Practical implicationsThe findings are useful for green building industry practitioners and for building owners and managers to maximise the benefits of owning and occupying green buildings by highlighting areas that may require particular attention in order to get it right. The results are particularly useful to support targeted efforts to meet the environmental aspects of the workspace needs of employees. This study aims to assist industry practitioners, owner and managers to learn from the experience of current occupiers and thereby assist the design and space management of office space in the future where such considerations will become increasingly important given the international concerns for improved resource management.Originality/valueWith international applicability, a large sample of office space users provides empirical evidence of what works/does not work within the green workplace, i.e. its strengths and weaknesses and provides a good reference point for similar studies in the future, leading to the establishment of clearer, more useful benchmarks of green building occupier satisfaction.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference14 articles.

1. Clements‐Croome, D. (2000), Creating the Productive Workplace, 2nd ed., E & FN Spon, London.

2. Fisk, W.J. (2000a), “Health and productivity gains from better indoor environments and their relationship with building energy efficiency”, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 537‐66.

3. Fisk, W.J. (2000b), “Review of health and productivity gains from better IEQ”, Proceedings of Healthy Buildings, Helsinki, August 6‐10, pp. 23‐34, SIY Indoor Air Information, Oy, Helsinki (invited paper).

4. Green Building Council Australia (2006), The Dollars and Sense of Green Buildings: Building the Business Case for Green Commercial Buildings in Australia, Green Building Council Industry Publication, Sydney.

5. Kato, H., Too, L. and Rask, A. (2009), “Occupier perception of green workplace environment: the Australian experience”, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 183‐95.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3