Author:
Nilsson Staffan,Ellström Per‐Erik
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this conceptual paper is to illuminate the problems that are associated with defining and identifying talent and to discuss the development of talent as a contributor to employability.Design/methodology/approachThe world of work is characterised by new and rapidly changing demands. Talent management has recently been the target of increasing interest and is considered to be a method by which organisations can meet the demands that are associated with increased complexity. Previous studies have often focused on the management of talent, but the issue of what exactly should be managed has generally been neglected. In this paper, the authors focus on discussing the substance of talent and the problems associated with identifying talent by using the following closely related concepts: employability, knowledge, and competence.FindingsEmployability is central to employee performance and organisational success. Individual employability includes general meta‐competence and context‐bound competence that is related to a specific profession and organisation. The concept of employability is wider than that of talent, but the possession of talent is critical to being employable. In this paper, the authors suggest a model in which talent includes individual, institutional, and organisational‐social dimensions.Practical implicationsThe illumination of different meanings of talent management and the substance of talent is crucial to the practical implication of central human resource development practices, such as training and development.Originality/valueThe paper shows that clarification of the conceptual boundaries and the presentation of a typology that is relevant to the understanding of talent are central to the creation of valid talent management systems that aim to define and develop talent.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Reference97 articles.
1. Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. (2007), “Unraveling HRM: identity, ceremony, and control in a management consulting firm”, Organization Science, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 711‐23.
2. Anderson, J.R., Greeno, J.G., Reder, L.M. and Simon, H.A. (2000), “Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 11‐13.
3. Arrow, K.J. (1973), “Higher education as a filter”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 193‐216.
4. Axelrod, B., Handfield‐Jones, H. and Michaels, E. (2002), “A new game plan for C players”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80 No. 1, pp. 80‐8.
5. Baker, D.P. (2009), “The educational transformation of work: towards a new synthesis”, Journal of Education and Work, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 163‐91.
Cited by
109 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献