Abstract
PurposeThe study explores different types of anti-luxurians on social media (SM), the characteristics of luxury brands, tendencies to disengage and the opposition to them to propose future directions for luxury marketing in the post-pandemic world.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative approach was employed, wherein 979 posts from SM platforms were analyzed with the text analytics software package KH Coder through word-frequency analysis and an inductive technique.FindingsThe analysis identified the presence of eight types of online anti-luxurians: true luxurians, nature-experienced lovers, life simplifiers, anti-haulers, highly expected consumers, natural environment protectors, antidiscrimination consumers and historic-politic antagonists. Their degree of disengagement and opposition were discussed and graphically mapped.Originality/valueThis is the first study to discover various types of anti-luxurians on SM platforms and graphically map their level of disengagement and opposition toward luxury brands. This study fills an existing critical gap in the luxury marketing literature.
Reference77 articles.
1. Social media marketing in luxury brands: a systematic literature review and implications for management research;Management Research Review,2018
2. The effect of brand extensions on product brand image;Journal of Product & Brand Management,2010
3. The effects of online incivility and consumer-to-consumer interactional justice on complainants, observers, and service providers during social media service recovery;Journal of Interactive Marketing,2018
4. Bastien, V. and Kapferer, J.N. (2013), “More on luxury anti-laws of marketing”, in Wiedmann, K.P. and Hennings, N. (Eds)., Luxury Marketing: A Challenge for Theory and Practice, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 19-34.
5. Sarcastic or assertive: how should brands reply to consumers' uncivil comments on social media in the context of brand activism?;Journal of Interactive Marketing,2022