Recruiting business PhDs: US minority motives and concerns

Author:

M. Forray Jeanie,E. Goodnight Janelle

Abstract

Purpose – While institutional efforts have shown modest results, AACSB statistics suggest that current practices are insufficient to increase more substantively the representation of minorities among doctorally qualified business school faculty. The purpose of this paper is to explore antecedents to the faculty representation issue – that is, the motives, concerns, and resources of US minority individuals with respect to business doctoral program entry – as a basis for improving minority faculty representation outcomes. Design/methodology/approach – A small sample of doctoral program directors were interviewed to ascertain their perspective on recruitment, design and delivery of PhD programs in business and from which a survey instrument was developed. A sample of 292 US minority respondents surveyed indicated their top reasons for and concerns about pursuing a doctorate, program selection and rejection criteria, sources of information and financing, and, for those in the decision-making stage, reasons for waiting to apply to a program. The paper compares responses of those who graduated from or are currently enrolled in a doctoral program in business with those who decided not to enroll. The paper also explores factors most salient to individuals currently contemplating enrolling but who have not yet decided to do so. Findings – Results suggest that mentorship of promising undergraduate and master's students by business faculty and current doctoral students is critical to US minority enrollments in doctoral programs; however, a school's physical location, required time and energy, and financial considerations also play a role in the decision-making process. The role of international students in diversity efforts by doctoral programs is also salient. Originality/value – Previous studies in multiple disciplines note the under-representation of US minority faculty in academe. In business education, suggestions for overcoming this gap have focussed on recruitment, mentoring, and/or networks and support groups but little is known about antecedents to entry (motives, concerns, and resources of US minority individuals) with respect to business doctoral programs.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Cultural Studies,Gender Studies

Reference46 articles.

1. AACSB International (2003), “‘Sustaining scholarship in business schools.’ Report of the doctoral faculty commission to aacsb international's board of directors”, available at: www.aacsb.edu/publications/dfc/SustainingScholarship.pdf (accessed January 2013).

2. AACSB International (2008), “Business school faculty trends 2008: a report from AACSB international knowledge services”, available at: www.aacsb.edu/resources/doctoral/publications.asp (accessed January 2013).

3. Arbaugh, J.B. , Bento, R. and Hwang, A. (2010), “Does the MBA experience support diversity? Demographic effects on program satisfaction”, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 391-415.

4. Arya, R. (2012), “Black feminism in the academy”, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, Vol. 31 Nos 5/6, pp. 556-572.

5. Backmon, I.R. (1998), “Doctoral accounting candidates: a profile of demographics and perceptions”, Equity & Excellence in Education, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 26-37.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3