Author:
Cui Ying Ying,Coenen Christian
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to examine the relation between relationship value and relationship quality in the business relationship between customers and facility management (FM) suppliers. To investigate the relationship value in outsourced FM services, the customer’s perspective is used to identify the dimensions and drivers of relationship value.
Design/methodology/approach
– A three-stage research design was used. The first stage was a thorough literature review, followed by expert interviews with six senior managers from the customer side, together with workshop and discussion with FM academics. In the third stage, quantitative data were gathered in a survey of 60 senior managers whose companies outsourced FM services.
Findings
– Findings show that relationship value is an antecedent to relationship quality of the business relationship in the context of FM. In all, 9 dimensions and 34 drivers of relationship value were identified, and a framework of relationship value for FM was established and measured. The sacrifice dimension correlates positively with relationship value, which contrasts with previous studies of relationship value in the context of business markets.
Research limitations/implications
– A framework of relationship value has been established for further in-depth investigation. There are limitations related to the sampling procedure: qualitative research selected large-sized organizations; the relationship value was only studied within the customer–FM supplier dyad; and a static view of customers’ perceived value from the relationship with their FM suppliers.
Practical implications
– The study provides a set of value dimensions and drivers for customers to assess how a FM supplier adds value in a relationship, and for FM suppliers to improve their services.
Originality/value
– This research narrowed the gap in relationship-value studies in FM. The findings can contribute to traditional theory that customer value can be the add-on between benefits (“what you get”) and sacrifices (“what you give”), rather than just a trade-off between these two dimensions.
Subject
Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference73 articles.
1. Alexander, K.
(2012), “Co-creation of value in FM”,
Managing Organizational Ecologies – Space, Management, and Organizations
, Taylor
&
Francis, New York, NY.
2. Anderson, E.
and
Weitz, B.
(1992), “The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels”,
Journal of Marketing Research
, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 18-34.
3. Anderson, J.C.
and
Gerbing, D.W.
(1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommend two step approach”,
Psychological Bulletin
, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-423.
4. Anderson, J.C.
,
Jain, D.C.
and
Chintagunta, P.K.
(1993), “Customer value assessment in business markets”,
Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing
, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 3-29.
5. Bagozzi, R.P.
(1975), “Marketing as exchange”,
Journal of Marketing
, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 32-39.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献