Author:
Kovács Gyöngyi,Spens Karen M.
Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to present current trends and developments in humanitarian logistics (HL) practice, research, and education, and analyze the gaps between these. The article serves as an update on previous literature reviews in HL.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is primarily conceptual and develops a framework for analyzing trends and gaps between HL research, education, and practice. Data are compiled through keyword searches, publicly available bibliographies, and web sites of educational institutions, as well as drawing on material from practitioner workshops, tutorials, conference presentations, and personal communication with practitioners and educators.FindingsGaps are revealed in HL practice, research, education, as well as between these. Few education programs to date consider the skill needs of humanitarian logisticians, but future trends in practice and research can be used to develop them further. More empirical and practice‐near research is called for at the same time as there is a need for comparative analyses, generic models, and theory building in HL.Research limitations/implicationsAny attempt to grasp current trends in a field is delimited by a lack of overview of the activities of an abundance of HL and fragmented research communities. The article advocates a broader view and openness across organizations and disciplines.Practical implicationsThe gap analysis indicates not only trends but also gaps in HL practice and highlights the need to consider new societal pressures such as climate change and urbanization.Social implicationsHL is concerned with serving beneficiaries; thus, their welfare is at the core of the discipline.Originality/valueSeveral articles have reviewed HL research before, but gaps between practice, research, and education have not yet been addressed.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Transportation
Reference32 articles.
1. Altay, N. and Green, W.G. III (2006), “OR/MS research in disaster operations management”, European Journal in Operational Research, Vol. 175 No. 1, pp. 475‐93.
2. Balcik, B., Iravani, S. and Smilowitz, K. (2010), “A review of equity in nonprofit and public sector: a vehicle routing perspective”, in Cochran, J.J. (Ed.), Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
3. Beamon, B. and Kotleba, S. (2006), “Inventory management support systems for emergency humanitarian relief operations in South Sudan”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 187‐212.
4. Beresford, A. and Pettit, S. (2010), “Humanitarian aid logistics: the Wenchuan and Haiti earthquakes compared”, in Kovács, G. and Spens, K.M. (Eds), Relief Supply Chain Management for Disasters: Humanitarian, Aid and Emergency Logistics, IGI Global, Hershey, PA.
5. ECHO (2010), “Humanitarian aid”, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/echo/index_en.htm (accessed 11 October 2010).
Cited by
189 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献