Citizens' attitudes towards e‐government and e‐governance: a UK study
Author:
Kolsaker Ailsa,Lee‐Kelley Liz
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to further understanding of citizens' attitudes towards electronic government (e‐government) and e‐governance.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative study was conducted of 3,000 citizens of a relatively prosperous town in South‐East England. A 10 per cent response rate provided 302 completed questionnaires; 216 users of e‐government portals and 86 non‐users.FindingsFindings indicate that whilst interest in e‐government is generally low overall, users appreciate personalisation, user‐friendliness and the ability to communicate. Users and non‐users perceive moderate value in e‐government for knowledge acquisition and communication, but little as a vehicle of democratic engagement. Those using e‐government frequently are more positive than other groups.Research limitations/implicationsThe relatively low‐response rate (though not unusual for quantitative methods) suggests a general lack of interest; however users of e‐government are appreciative of a few, key benefits. In relation to enhancing participation, the findings suggest that Government ambitions far outstrip those of its citizens. To improve usage, the authors propose that non‐users need to be tempted online in a secure environment, that users should be provided with personalised pages in line with their expectations, that elected members should be encouraged to view with web as a means of reaching out to voters and that citizens should be educated in exploiting the potentially valuable online tools to enhance participation. The study is limited by the exclusive use of quantitative methods; the outcomes suggest that further, qualitative, research could be valuable in exploring user needs, motivations, competence, and level of political engagement.Originality/valueThe paper adds insight into citizens' attitudes towards e‐government and e‐governance.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference49 articles.
1. Andersen, K.V. and Henriksen, H.Z. (2006), “eGovernment maturity models: extension of the Layne and Lee model”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 236‐48. 2. Barnes, M., Newman, J., Knops, A. and Sullivan, H. (2003), “Constituting the ‘public’ in public participation”, Public Administration, Vol. 81 No. 2, pp. 379‐99. 3. Biasiott, M. and Nannucci, R. (2004), “Learning to become an e‐citizen: the European and Italian policies”, in Wimmer, M. (Ed.), Knowledge Management in Electronic Government, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3035, Springer, Berlin, pp. 269‐80. 4. (The) Cabinet Office (2005), Transformational Government, Enabled by Technology, The Stationary Office, London, available at: www.cio.gov.uk/documents/pdf/transgov/transgov‐strategy.pdf (accessed 30 November 2007). 5. Calista, D.J. and Melitski, J. (2007), “E‐Government and eGovernance: converging constructs of public sector information and communications technologies”, Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 87‐120.
Cited by
108 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|