Author:
Eadens Danielle Maya,Cranston-Gingras Ann,Dupoux Errol,Eadens Daniel Wayne
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine police officer perceptions about persons with intellectual disabilities.
Design/methodology/approach
– In this study, 188 officers from three police districts in the Southeast USA were surveyed using a modified Social Distance Questionnaire.
Findings
– Results indicate that the majority of police officers surveyed had little or no training with regard to disabilities and that most are willing to interact socially with individuals with intellectual disabilities. Further, this study found that female officers had significantly greater positive attitudes toward individuals with intellectual disabilities than male respondents and that white respondents were more knowledgeable about these individuals than those from minority backgrounds.
Research limitations/implications
– While these results are significant, it should be noted that the number of female and minority participants was relatively low.
Practical implications
– The paper includes recommendations for professional development for police officer and criminal justice training programs.
Social implications
– As individuals with developmental and intellectual disabilities are increasingly integrated into society, their vulnerability to mishandling by the criminal justice system and police officers intensifies. This paper allows police officers and those within the field of criminal justice an opportunity to examine perceptions as they seek to understand how police and general societal perceptions impact the way that people interact with persons with intellectual disabilities.
Originality/value
– This paper fulfills a need to examine attitudes of police officers toward citizens with intellectual disabilities in the communities in which they live. These attitudes often affect the way that police officers interact with citizens and identify additional training needs to better prepare officers for diverse individuals they may will encounter.
Subject
Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference46 articles.
1. Asscher, J.J.
,
Van der Put, C.E.
and
Stams, G.J.J.M.
(2012), “Differences between juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disability in offense type and risk factors”,
Research in Developmental Disabilities
, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 1905-1923.
2. Bailey, A.
,
Barr, O.
and
Bunting, B.
(2001), “Police attitudes toward people with intellectual disability: an evaluation of awareness training”,
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 344-350. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00339.x.
3. Baldry, E.
,
Clarence, M.
,
Dowse, L.
and
Troller, J.
(2013), “Reducing vulnerability to harm in adults with cognitive disabilities in the Australian criminal justice system”,
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 222-229.
4. Bartley, J.J.
(2006), “Law, ethics, and gender: an update on autism: science, gender, and the law”,
Gender Medicine
, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 73-78.
5. BBC News
(2014), “DNA evidence overturns 30-year convictions in US case”, BBC News, September 2, available at: www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29039964 (accessed September 3, 2014).
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献