Happy ever after in the quasi-market place? The dowry logic of active labour policy in the Lombardy Region

Author:

Sabatinelli Stefania,Villa Matteo

Abstract

Purpose – The dote system is the most recent and only way to finance and deliver services in the training and labour policy field in Lombardy (Italy), strengthening the regional quasi-market approach. The purpose of this paper is to analyse its logic and highlight the implications for the policy system. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative case-study including preliminary documentation, analysis of administrative data, in-depth interviews with stakeholders and practitioners. Findings – The dote system is based on a strongly pre-structured and pure performance logic. It predefines forms, ways and steps towards people’s “autonomy”, further categorising the policy system and establishing a combination of individualisation without personalisation. The strict regulation makes it difficult to design accessible, high-quality and tailor-made interventions. Dote could represent an interesting innovation for high-profile measures, but as a universal equivalent it often fails to match the needs of people and the labour market. Research limitations/implications – The self-funded research is limited to a regional context, analysed against the background of European welfare transformations. Greater effort in qualitative research could improve the knowledge about the implications of NPM and quasi-markets. Practical implications – Regional centralism is strengthened; local authorities and private bodies are excluded from planning; freedom of choice is limited. A marriage of convenience between providers and users increases the level of stress and the dispersion of resources. Originality/value – Dote is a particular experiment in the panorama of activation. It works in a unique way, impacting on governance and activation modes. The paper is addressed to researchers, practitioners and policy makers interested in gaining better understanding of the implications of quasi-markets and NPM.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science

Reference39 articles.

1. Avanzini, K. and Ghetti, V. (2010), “Accreditamento nel sociale: quale strategia?”, Prospettive Sociali e Sanitarie , No. 5 No. 2010, pp. 1-6.

2. Bartlett, W. and Le Grand, J. (1993), Quasi-Markets and Social Policy , Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.

3. Bateson, G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind , University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

4. Bifulco, L. (2011), “Quasi-mercato e sussidiarietà come pilastri del modello lombardo di welfare”, in Carabelli, G. and Facchini, C. (Eds), Il Modello Lombardo di Welfare , FrancoAngeli, Milano, pp. 39-58.

5. Bonetti, M. and Villa, M. (2014), “In the shadow of legalism: understanding community participation in an overly-bureaucratic context”, Critical Policy Studies , Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 447-464.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3