Author:
Ratiu Catalin,B. Anderson Beverlee
Abstract
Purpose
– There are many different conceptualizations to sustainable development and these different approaches may have led to confusion amongst the public. The purpose of this paper is to explore the identities of the term and how the confused identity may be leading to problems for sustainable development efforts.
Design/methodology/approach
– The design is exploratory, using both secondary and primary data to understand the different sustainable development concepts.
Findings
– There is no consistent understanding or use of the term “sustainable development” among various groups.
Research limitations/implications
– Future research should include a larger sample that is more representative of people from different backgrounds and geographical areas.
Practical implications
– The public is generally willing to support only projects that it understands. Without a clear understanding of sustainable development, the public will be less inclined to support these efforts.
Originality/value
– This study examines the perceptions and understandings of the term by the general public representing different generations.
Reference23 articles.
1. (The) American Heritage Dictionary
(2006), The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed., Houghton Mifflin Company, Chicago.
2. Bonnett, M.
(1999), “Education for sustainable development: a coherent philosophy for environmental education?”, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 313-324.
3. Byrch, C.
,
Kearins, K.
,
Milne, M.
and
Morgan, R.
(2007), “Sustainable ‘what’? a cognitive approach to understanding sustainable development”, Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 26-41.
4. Carson, R.
(1962), Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin, Chicago.
5. Conference Alerts
(2013), Sustainable Development Events, available at: www.Conferencealerts.com (accessed 18 February 2013).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献