Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to understand how superintendents leading large, high-profile and politically complex urban districts make sense of their district–community context and advocate for issues of equity.Design/methodology/approachThis qualitative multi-case study took place over the 2017–18 school year and involved superintendents leading large urban districts in the United States, with data derived from semi-structured interviews, observations of school board and other public meetings and document collection.FindingsThis article describes how superintendents' sensemaking around equity was situated within the context of interactions with district board members and other stakeholder groups within their communities and influenced by their sense of professional vulnerability of public advocacy. Leaders often felt the need to attenuate their personal sense of equity and act strategically when framing related policies or practices. This study highlights examples by which superintendents were forced to confront instances when community support and prioritization of equity issues did not match their own and subsequently struggled to make sense of how to frame issues that were not in alignment.Originality/valueDespite their positional authority, relatively little attention has been paid to the experience of school district superintendents in fostering equity. This study provides practical examples of superintendents making sense of complex leadership scenarios and taking strategic action to promote equity in authentic circumstances and has important implications for research and practice.
Subject
Public Administration,Education
Reference57 articles.
1. Funding disparities and the inequitable distribution of teachers: evaluating sources and solutions;Education Policy Analysis Archives,2012
2. Tempered radicals and servant leaders: black females persevering in the superintendency;Educational Administration Quarterly,2005
3. What ‘counts’ as educational policy? notes toward a new paradigm;Harvard Educational Review,2005
4. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment;Annual Review of Sociology,2000
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献