A global investigation of key turning points in business process maturity

Author:

McCormack Kevin,Willems Jurgen,van den Bergh Joachim,Deschoolmeester Dirk,Willaert Peter,Indihar Štemberger Mojca,Škrinjar Rok,Trkman Peter,Bronzo Ladeira Marcelo,Paulo Valadares de Oliveira Marcos,Bosilj Vuksic Vesna,Vlahovic Nikola

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report on the results of research into the precedence of the maturity factors, or key turning points in business process maturity (BPM) implementation efforts. A key turning point is a component of BPM that stabilizes within an organization and leads to the next maturity level.Design/methodology/approachSeveral years of data from over 1,000 companies in the USA, Europe, China, and Brazil that have completed a BPM assessment are analyzed to identify which components of BPM stabilize, when and in what order. Different analysis methods are employed in order to identify global commonalities and differences.FindingsThe paper identifies key turning points from several different perspectives using several different approaches and develops some conclusions common to all methods used in this research.Research limitations/implicationsThe relationship between the components (dependencies) is only suggested but not statistically analyzed. Several data sets are also on the low end of sample size for the methods used and some parts of the research used ad hoc selection of companies of arbitrarily distributed companies into different groups.Practical implicationsThe results can be useful for leaders and teams that are attempting the journey to process maturity. The guide‐posts, milestones, and measures can help answer the question “Where am I on this journey and what is next?”Originality/valueA plethora of maturity models has emerged that claim to guide an organization through the process of building levels of maturity that lead to competitive advantage. To date, there has been a lack of quantitative studies documenting these road‐maps. The paper provides global, quantitative evidence of the critical maturity components associated at each level of maturity.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference32 articles.

1. Aysar, P.S. and Johnson, W.C. (2003), “Strategic capabilities of business process: looking for competitive advantage”, Competitiveness Review, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 46‐52.

2. Berry, M.J.A. and Linoff, G.S. (2000), Mastering Data Mining, Wiley, Chichester.

3. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A. and Stone, C.J. (1984), Classification and Regression Trees, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.

4. Burlton, R.T. (2001), Business Process Management: Profiting from Process, Sams, Indianapolis, IN.

5. Buxbaum, P.A. (1995), “The horizontal company”, Transportation & Distribution, June, pp. 36‐82.

Cited by 118 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Manufacturing Companies Industry 4.0 maturity level: A multivariate analysis;Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management;2024-02-29

2. A Configurational Approach to Maturity Model Development – Using fsQCA to Build a Multiple-Pathway Maturity Model;Communications of the Association for Information Systems;2024

3. Adapting to the Dynamic Nature of Business Processes in the Digital Age;Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing;2024

4. A measurement instrument for the “ten principles of good BPM”;Business Process Management Journal;2023-08-09

5. PROCESS MATURITY OF CROATIAN COMPANIES;Ekonomska misao i praksa;2023-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3