An empirical study about the status of business process management

Author:

Neubauer Thomas

Abstract

PurposeRecently, business process management (BPM) is among the most important managerial topics because it allows companies an agile adaptation to changing business requirements. Consultants and researchers are regularly proposing new methods and concepts based on BPM for further increasing the efficiency of corporate processes. However, from an empirical point of view it is crucial to determine the current status in practice and derive goals for research and technology transfer. This paper aims to address these issues.Design/methodology/approachFor this reason the survey “Status Quto Business Process Management” is carried out in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland on a yearly basis. This survey aims at identifying current trends and strategic plans of companies as well as its realization in practice and highlights the remaining steps towards the process (‐focused) organization (PFO). The paper summarizes the results of the survey carried out in 2006 among 185 decision makers and shows a comparison with the results of the previous years as well as comparable surveys.FindingsThis paper analyzes the current state of BPM in the market, analyzes the strategic, organizational and technical aspects of BPM in the participating companies. The survey shows that although the majority of the participating companies are involved with BPM initiatives, only a very small number of companies follows holistic approaches and has reached the status of a PFO.Research limitations/implicationsAs the survey especially focused on IT‐driven companies a limitation of this survey could be seen in the fact that it does not exactly cover the branch distribution of the population, e.g. the financial sector is over‐represented due to the fact that the survey included branch specific questions for the financial sector (note that these questions are not part of this paper). However, the comparison with the surveys “BP Report” and “State of BPM” shows that these surveys come with similar distributions of the branches.Practical implicationsThis paper provides a very useful source for companies in benchmarking their status regarding BPM. It provides them with information that allows to compare their status on the way towards a PFO with their competitors.Originality/valueThis paper provides a very useful source for companies in benchmarking their status regarding BPM. The survey does not only investigate what is being done by the participating companies but also interested in the reasons why it is done. Compared to existing surveys it: investigates connections between processes and business strategy, process risk handling, references models, as well as methods for evaluating the contributions of IT to the business processes; uses statistical methods for measuring the significance of the results and; has a specific focus on companies in the Germany‐speaking countries Austria, Germany and Switzerland.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference25 articles.

1. Akhigbe, A. and Whyte, A.M. (2004), “The Gramm‐Leach‐Bliley Act of 1999: risk implications for the financial services industry”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 435‐46.

2. Allweyer, T. (2005), Geschäftsprozessmanagement, Strategie, Entwurf, Implementierung, Controlling, W3L‐Verlag, Herdecke Bochum.

3. (The) American Heritage Dictionaries of the English Language (2000), The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.

4. Anderer, G. and Châlons, C. (2006), Business Process Report, IDS Scheer, Saarbrücken.

5. Avizienis, A., Laprie, J.‐C., Randell, B. and Landwehr, C. (2004), “Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing”, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 11‐33.

Cited by 67 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3