Dynamics of value propositions: insights from service‐dominant logic

Author:

Kowalkowski Christian

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to examine the notion of value propositions (promises of reciprocal value between service providers and their customers), value‐in‐exchange and value‐in‐use, all within the conceptual context of service‐dominant (S‐D) logic.Design/methodology/approachResponding to calls in the recent literature for an academic critique of S‐D logic, its key constructs, and its application in marketing situations of varying complexity, the paper presents a conceptual analysis of the determinants of value emphasis in value propositions from the S‐D perspective.FindingsFour guiding principles are derived from a rigorous analysis of the relevant literatures. Ways are discussed in which firms might achieve greater flexibility in designing their market offerings, and thus manage different customer segments using different value propositions. The general conclusion is that the ability to communicate a firm's value propositions strategically and effectively is a new area for the development of competence at the core of competitive advantage.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings pave the way for empirical research into the dynamics of value propositions. Since the main focus of the conceptual framework is on the customer‐provider dyad, future studies should broaden coverage to multilateral settings and networked environments.Practical implicationsFactors that determine the relative emphasis in value propositions between value‐in‐exchange and value‐in‐use are discussed, and the management implications derived from each of the four principles identified.Originality/valueThe paper elaborates the application of S‐D logic in marketing by investigating the determinants of relative emphasis of value propositions.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing

Reference55 articles.

1. Abrahamsson, M. and Wandel, S. (1998), “A model of tiering in third‐party logistics with a service parts distribution case study”, Transport Logistics, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 181‐94.

2. Anderson, E. and Jap, S.D. (2005), “The dark side of close relationships”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 75‐82.

3. Anderson, J.C., Kumar, N. and Narus, J.A. (2007), Value Merchants: Demonstrating and Documenting Superior Value in Business Markets, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

4. Anderson, J.C., Thomson, J.B. and Wynstra, F. (2000), “Combining value and price to make purchase decisions in business markets”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 307‐29.

5. Andersson, D. and Pruth, M. (2006), “Purchasing third‐party logistics services”, Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference for Nordic Researchers in Logistics, Oslo, pp. 1‐15.

Cited by 157 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3