Author:
Nemery Philippe,Ishizaka Alessio,Camargo Mauricio,Morel Laure
Abstract
PurposeMost of the proposed decision aid methods provide the user only with a prescriptive approach (quantitative analysis) without any descriptive approach (qualitative analysis). It is therefore not possible to justify and recommend ways of improvement. The purpose of this paper is to introduce visualization techniques to complement prescriptive approaches.Design/methodology/approachVisual techniques have been developed for the FlowSort sorting method, namely the FS‐GAIA and stacked bar diagrams.FindingsIt is found that with visual techniques, fine details can be captured, e.g. detection of incomparability (with FS‐GAIA) and the composition of a score (with stacked bar diagrams).Research limitations/implicationsIn the future, it is expected that other multi‐criteria decision methods will be complemented by prescriptive approaches.Practical implicationsA real case study is introduced in order to illustrate the practicality of the visual techniques. In this paper, the innovation performances of small and medium enterprises from the French Lorraine region are assessed.Social implicationsIt is expected that the quality of the decisions taken are improved because of being better informed.Originality/valueThe paper, using a real case study, provides important new tools to enhance decision quality.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference20 articles.
1. Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R.B., Albadvi, A. and Aghdasi, M. (2010), “PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 200 No. 1, pp. 198‐215.
2. Brans, J.‐P. and Mareschal, B. (1994), “The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 12 Nos 4/5, pp. 297‐310.
3. Brans, J.‐P. and Mareschal, B. (2005), “PROMETHEE methods”, in Figueira, J., Greco, S. and Ehrgott, M. (Eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 163‐98.
4. Burgelman, R., Maidique, M.A. and Wheelwright, S.C. (2004), Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY, pp. 8‐12.
5. Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P. and Voss, C.A. (1996), “Development of a technical innovation audit”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 105‐36.
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献