Leveraging mega-threats to reduce prejudice: a model for multi-level changes

Author:

Waples Ethan P.ORCID,Botsford Morgan WhitneyORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe paper introduces a multi-level model to reduce prejudice through supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) at the institutional, organizational, and individual levels. The purpose of the model is to provide theoretically undergirded pathways to explain how societal events calling for systemic changes in DEI practices can engage and inculcate such systemic changes in organizations and institutions.Design/methodology/approachThe model draws upon macro-level (i.e. institutional theory and institutional logics) theories from sociology and strategic management, meso-level theories from leadership and strategy, and micro-level organizational behavior and human resource management theories.FindingsResting on open systems theory (Katz and Kahn, 1966) as a backdrop, the authors address how institutional changes result in organizational level changes driving multi-level outcomes of increased DEI, reduced prejudice in work-related settings, and performance gains. The authors suggest the recursive nature of the model can trigger institutional level shifts in logics or result in isomorphic pressures that further change organizational fields and organizations.Originality/valueThe contribution rests in a multi-level examination to help understand how environmental pressures can motivate organizations to enact broader changes related to social justice, specifically increasing efforts in DEI inside the operational aspects of the organization. By enacting these changes, the authors suggest the resultant positive changes in organizations will enhance culture and performance, creating isomorphic pressure for industry wide changes that may begin to move the needle on addressing systemic problems that feed prejudicial behavior in the workplace.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference109 articles.

1. AACSB (2020), “2020 Guiding principles and standards for business accreditation”, available at: https://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/accreditation/business/2020%20aacsb%20business%20accreditation%20standards%20july%202021.ashx?la=en&hash=E5C91E5DDDD10DD6BE24884839FB23FB6DEB59D6.

2. What are the odds? How demographic similarity affects the prevalence of perceived employment discrimination;Journal of Applied Psychology,2008

3. Action research: a paradigm for achieving social change;Small Group Research,2008

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Organizational Resilience through the Philosophical Lens of Aristotelian and Heraclitean Philosophy;Philosophy of Management;2024-09-04

2. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion;Effective Human Resources Management in the Multigenerational Workplace;2023-12-18

3. An interdisciplinary approach to examining prejudice at work: a levels of analysis perspective;Management Decision;2022-08-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3