Author:
Hammersley Geraldine,Pinnington Ashly
Abstract
Continuous improvement groups are teams of employees with special responsibility for improving quality. This paper reports on the first 12 months of a pilot implementation by Land Rover and gives the main results of initial interviews with team members. The analysis concentrates on the attitudes of members who were previously active participants in the quality circle programme, which was formally closed at the end of 1996. The main finding at this stage of the pilot was that these employees welcomed the increased structure and management control of continuous improvement groups where it facilitated improvements to quality consistent with Rover Group’s business goals. Such willingness to accept reduced autonomy in exchange for increased employee involvement and contribution is explained by characterising continuous improvement groups as a stewardship approach to quality management.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Industrial relations,General Decision Sciences
Reference7 articles.
1. Brennan, M. (1991), “Mismanagement and quality circles: how middle managers influence direct participation”, Employee Relations, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 22‐9.
2. Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D. and Donaldson, L. (1997), “Toward a stewardship theory of management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 20‐47.
3. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. and Snyderman, B.B. (1959), The Motivation to Work, 2nd edition, Chapman & Hall, London.
4. Macduffie, J.P. (1995), “Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 197‐221.
5. Maslow, A. (1949), “A theory of human motivation”, Psychological Review, Vol. 50, pp. 370‐96.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献