Can impact factors substitute for the results of local use studies? Findings from an Australian case study

Author:

Altmann Klaus G.,Gorman G.E.

Abstract

The usefulness of impact factors as a substitute for conducting a costly local use study was investigated in an Australian university library. The results presented in this paper are consistent with the view that logical deselection decisions can be made only by using the results of a local use study. A number of reasons are advanced for why impact factors are poor predictors of local use.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference17 articles.

1. Altmann, K.G. and Gorman, G.E. (1996), “Usage, citation analysis and costs as indicators for journal deselection and cancellation: a selective literature review”, Australian Library Review, Vol. 13, pp. 379‐92.

2. Altmann, K.G. and Gorman, G.E. (1998), “The usefulness of impact factors in serial selection: a rank and mean analysis using ecology journals”, Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory, Vol. 22, pp. 147‐59.

3. Broadus, R.N. (1985), “The measurement of periodicals use”, Serials Review, Vol. 11, pp. 57‐61.

4. Bustion, Marifran and Treadwell, J. (1990), “Reported relative value of journals versus use: a comparison”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 51, pp. 142‐51.

5. Cayless, C. (1979), “Some quantitative methods for determining the utility of periodicals in an academic library”, in Watson, P. (Ed.), Profiling a Periodicals Collection, Footscray Institute of Technology, Melbourne, pp. 43‐60.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Analyzing the Relationship between Citation-Based Impact Metrics and Electronic Journal Usage: A Case Study;Collection Management;2023-07-06

2. The performance of Asian S&T journals in international citation indicators;Learned Publishing;2017-03-31

3. Citation analysis of doctoral dissertations at IIMA: A review of the local use of journals;Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services;2011-03

4. Citation analysis of doctoral dissertations at IIMA;Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services;2011-01

5. An analysis model of creating a core journal collection for academic libraries;Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services;2009-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3