Abstract
PurposeThis article aims to increase the understanding of the role of individual actors and arenas in dealing with multiple institutional logics in family firms.Design/methodology/approachThis study follows a case-study approach of two family-owned newspaper companies. Based on interviews and secondary sources, the empirical material was analysed focussing on three institutional logics, that is, family logic, management logic and journalistic logic.FindingsFirst, the authors show how and in which arenas competing logics are balanced in family-owned newspaper companies. Second, the authors highlight that family owners are central actors in the process of balancing different institutional logics. Further, they analyse how family members can become hybrid owner-managers, meaning that they have access to all institutional logics and become central actors in the balancing process.Originality/valueThe authors reveal how multiple institutional logics are balanced in family firms by including formal actors and arenas as additional lenses. Therefore, owning family members, especially hybrid owner-managers, are the best-suited individual actors to balance competing logics. Hybrid owner-managers are members of the owner families who are also skilled in one or several professions.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference110 articles.
1. Balancing tensions during convergence: duality management in a newspaper company;International Journal on Media Management,2009
2. Albert, S. and Adams, E. (2002), “The hybrid identity of law firms”, in Moingeon, B. and Soenen, G. (Eds), Corporate and Organizational Identities, Routledge, London, New York, pp. 35-50.
3. A new professional landscape: entangled institutional logics in two Swedish welfare professions;Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies,2018
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献