Author:
Bebbington Jan,Higgins Colin,Frame Bob
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to document organizations' self descriptions of why they initiated sustainable development (SD) reporting and explore these explanations using an institutional theory framework.Design/methodology/approachConstructs organizational narratives from semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with reporting champions who participated in an SD reporting workshop series. The narratives are analysed using institutional theory to explore how regulatory, normative and cognitive institutions combine with organizational dynamics to influence SD reporting activity.FindingsFor these particular organizations, choosing to engage in reporting appears not to be a rational choice. Rather reporting is initiated because it has come to be an accepted part of pursuing a differentiation strategy, it offers some contribution to existing business challenges, and organizations value the rewards it offers. This rationale constitutes a cognitive mechanism within institutional theory.Originality/valueThe paper provides useful information on initiating sustainable development reporting based on organizations' self descriptions.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference135 articles.
1. Adams, C. (2002), “Internal organizational factors influencing social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorising”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 223‐50.
2. Adams, C. and Harte, G. (1998), “The changing portrayal of the employment of women in British banks and retail companies' annual reports”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 781‐812.
3. Ball, A. (2005), “Environmental accounting and change in UK local government”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 46‐373.
4. Ball, A. (2007), “Environmental accounting and change: exploring the institutional toolkit”, Proceedings of the 5th Asian‐Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, Auckland, July 8‐10, pp. 8‐10.
5. Bansal, P. and Roth, K. (2000), “Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 717‐36.
Cited by
198 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献