Abstract
Prior empirical research into factors which are influential in determining the extent and nature of corporate social reporting has primarily been concerned with the impact of corporate characteristics (such as size and industry grouping) or general contextual factors (such as the social, political and economic context). Relatively little prior work has examined the internal contextual factors and their impact on reporting despite increasing emphasis in the field of practice on reporting processes and governance structures. In this study interviews were conducted with seven large multinational companies in the chemical and pharmaceutical sectors of the UK and Germany in order to identify any internal contextual factors influencing the nature and extent of reporting. The work highlights the lack of explanatory power of the existing social reporting theories. A more inclusive model of corporate social reporting is presented.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference57 articles.
1. Adams, C.A. (1999), The Nature and Processes of Corporate Reporting on Ethical Issues, CIMA Rresearch Monograph, CIMA, London.
2. Adams, C.A. and Harte, G.F. (1998), “The changing portrayal of the employment of women in British banks’ and retail companies’ corporate annual reports”, Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 781‐812.
3. Adams, C.A. and Harte, G.F. (2000), “Making discrimination visible”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 56‐79.
4. Adams, C.A. and Kuasirikun, N. (2000), “A comparative analysis of corporate reporting on ethical issues by UK and German chemical and pharmaceutical companies”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 53‐80.
5. Adams, C.A., Coutts, A. and Harte, G.F. (1995a), “Corporate equal opportunities (non), disclosure”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 87‐108.
Cited by
715 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献