Author:
Roberts Aki,Roberts John M.
Abstract
PurposePolice agency networks are likely to be important for the adoption of policing innovations and the visibility of demonstration projects. This study of police network data has four main goals: to use multivariate models for the influence of agency characteristics on the sort of agency it contacted; to investigate the extent of symmetry of ties in the police network; to examine models for the specific departments chosen as agencies' network contacts; and to identify, through network data, agencies as “relative experts” in several different policing domains.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses Weiss agency survey data to conduct a variety of analyses of agencies' choices of informal communication partners.FindingsThe analysis showed regularities in agencies' choices of contacts. Whether a contact was of the same type or from the same state as the respondent was influenced by the respondent's population and type. There was some evidence of size‐based asymmetry in contacts. The choice of a particular contact was influenced by agency type, population and geographic distance. There appeared to be “relative experts” in specific policing domains.Originality/valueThe results increase understanding of the structure of the agency network. By describing the nature of communication ties on planning issues, the results give essential background for any efforts to encourage the diffusion of policing innovations (or successful practices) by inducing ties between particular agencies. Results can also help predict the potential visibility of demonstration projects if placed in particular agencies.
Subject
Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference31 articles.
1. Agresti, A. (2002), Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
2. Banaszak‐Holl, J., Allen, S., Mor, V. and Schott, T. (1998), “Organizational characteristics associated with agency position in community care networks”, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol. 39, pp. 368‐85.
3. Berger, W.B., Mertes, L. and Graham, A. (1994), “Blueprint for police‐community partnerships”, Police Chief, Vol. 61, pp. 20‐5.
4. Burgreen, B. and McPherson, N. (1990), “Implementing POP: the San Diego experience”, Police Chief, Vol. 57, pp. 50‐6.
5. Chamard, S.E. (2003), “Innovation‐diffusion networks and the adoption and discontinuance of computerized crime mapping by municipal police departments in New Jersey”, PhD dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献