Informal social networks within and between organisations

Author:

Whelan Chad

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the underlying relational properties of security networks by focusing specifically on the relationship between formal and informal ties, and interpersonal and inter-organisational trust. Design/methodology/approach – The research is based on 20 qualitative interviews with senior members of police and security agencies across the field of counter-terrorism in Australia. Findings – The findings suggest that the underlying relational properties of security networks are highly complex, making it difficult to distinguish between formal and informal ties, interpersonal and inter-organisational trust. The findings also address the importance of informal ties and interpersonal trust for the functioning of organisational security networks. Research limitations/implications – The research is exploratory in nature and extends to a number of organisational security networks in the field of counter-terrorism in Australia. While it is anticipated that the findings will be relevant in a variety of contexts, further research is required to advance our knowledge of the implications and properties of informal social networks within defined network boundaries. Practical implications – The findings suggest that the functioning of security networks is likely to be highly dependent on the underlying social relationships between network members. This has practical implications for those responsible for designing and managing security networks. Originality/value – The paper calls attention to a very understudied topic by focusing on the dynamics of informal ties and interpersonal trust within organisational security networks.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. Australian Government (2010), Counter-Terrorism White Paper: Securing Australia – Protecting Our Community , ACT, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Canberra.

2. Australian Government (2011), “Independent review of the intelligence community”, ACT, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Canberra.

3. Bachmann, R. and Zaheer, A. (Eds) (2006), Handbook of Trust Research , Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

4. Bouchard, M. (2014), Advances in Research on Illicit Networks , Routledge, London.

5. Brass, D. , Galaskiewicz, J. , Greve, H. and Tsai, W. (2004), “Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 795-817.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3