Author:
Heasman Michael,Henson Spencer
Abstract
Presents the results of a postal questionnaire to UK food and drink manufacturers on the costs of compliance with food regulation. In particular, the questionnaire focused on the usefulness of compliance cost assessments ‐ introduced by the Government in 1985 across all government departments as an analytical tool for assessing the regulatory costs to business ‐ as they relate to food businesses. Explains that the questionnaire sought to establish to what extent food companies actually costed the impact of food regulation on their business operations and explored other aspects of food regulation, such as the benefits and constraints. Reports the results which gave some unexpected insights on the costs of compliance with food regulation. For example, the majority of respondents were not aware that the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food carried out compliance cost assessments on food regulation; around two‐thirds of the sample found it “difficult” or “very difficult” to identify where compliance costs would affect their company and an even greater proportion (more than three‐quarters) said they would have problems quantifying compliance costs. Concludes that the compliance cost assessment, as a tool for helping to analyse the cost of food regulation on businesses, is an inappropriate method for the food sector and the development of new methods should be considered.
Subject
Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference6 articles.
1. Department of Trade and Industry (1992, Checking the Cost to Business: A Guide to Compliance Cost Assessment, DTI, London.
2. Eurofood, October 1993, p. 3.
3. Food, Drink and Agriculture Task Force (1993, Proposals for Deregulation, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
4. Froud, J. and Ogus. A. (1996, ‘“Rational’ social regulation and compliance cost assessment”, ublic Administration, (forthcoming).
5. Froud, J., Boden, R., Ogus, A. and Stubbs, P. (1994, “Toeing the line: compliance cost assessment in Britain”, Policy and Politics, Vol. 24 No. 4.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献